Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT136 S2 Q23 Explanation

As a general rule, the larger

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

As a general rule, the larger a social group of primates, the more time its members spend grooming one another. The main purpose of this social grooming is the maintenance of social cohesion. Furthermore, group size among primates tends to increase proportionally with the size of the neocortex, the seat of higher apart from parents grooming their children, these humans spent virtually no time grooming one another.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

Which one of the following, if true, would do most to resolve the apparent

Answer choices

  1. Too Weak4% picked this

    Early humans were much more likely to groom themselves than are the members of

    This fails to explain why early humans did so.

  2. Correct84% picked this

    Early humans developed languages, which provided a more effective way of maintaining social cohesion

    Why this is right

    This explains how the main purpose of social grooming could be accomplished in some other way thereby reducing the need for these early humans to engage in social grooming.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Contradiction9% picked this

    Early humans were not as extensively covered with hair as are other primates, and consequently they had less

    The statements suggest that the primary reason for social grooming is to maintain social cohesion and this does not free the early humans from the need to maintain social cohesion.

  4. Out of Scope3% picked this

    While early humans probably lived in large groups, there is strong evidence that they hunted

    Distinguishing the size of the group for hunting from the size of the group for living does not explain the lack of social grooming with these humans.

  5. Deepens the Paradox1% picked this

    Many types of primates other than humans have fairly large neocortex regions and display

    This makes it all the stranger why humans with large neocortex regions would not groom one another.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free