Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT136 S1 P3 Q16 Explanation

Toni Morrison’s Jazz

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMethodHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Music and literature, rivals among the arts, have not coexisted without intruding on each other’s terrain. Ever since what we think of as “literature” developed out of the sounds of spoken, sung, and chanted art, writing has aspired to the condition of music, in which form contributes significantly to content. Nowhere is 1992 novel Jazz, a novel set in the Harlem section of New York City in 1926.

In Jazz, the connection to music is found not only in the novel’s plot but, more strikingly, in the way in which the story is told. The narration slips easily from the third-person omniscience of the narrator’s disembodied voice—which, though sensitive and sympathetic, claims no particular identity, gender, or immersion in specific of a jazz band which intertwines its ensemble sound with the individuality of embedded solo performances.

In jazz, composer and conductor Duke Ellington was the first to construct his compositions with his individual musicians and their unique “voices” in mind. Yet no matter how lengthy his musicians’ improvisations, no matter how bold or inventive their solos might be, they always performed within the undeniable logic of the composer’s an art of composition that Duke Ellington perfected around the time in which Jazz is set.

In this novel, Morrison has found a way, paradoxically, to create the sense of an ensemble of characters improvising within the fixed scope of a carefully constructed collective narration. By simulating the style of a genius of music while exhibiting Morrison’s the very possibilities of narrative point of view.

What this question is testing

Method

Your task

Describe how the argument proceeds — the technique it uses to reach its conclusion.

Common trap

Answers that describe a method the argument doesn't actually use.

Winning move

Track the role each statement plays, then match that to the choice describing the same moves.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

The author’s discussion in the first paragraph proceeds in which one of

Answer choices

  1. Contradicted: denial2% picked this

    from a common claim about the arts, to a denial of this claim as applied to a particular artistic tradition, to a

    The first ingredient is probably fine, but "denial" of this claim makes no sense, when the author transitions from the wide angle lens of Music vs. Literature into the medium field lens of African American art by saying "Nowhere is this truer than in the African American tradition".

  2. Correct72% picked this

    from a general remark about two art forms, to a similar observation about a particular artistic tradition, to a specific comment about a particular

    Why this is right

    This matches our first two ingredients very well and the third ingredient reasonably well. 1. the author introduces a historical tension between two different art forms a general remark about two art forms 2. the author applies this tension to African American art a similar observation about a particular artistic tradition 3. the author zooms in on one specific artwork by an African American that blends these two forms in an unprecedented way. a particular work that exemplifies the prior remarks The fact that Toni Morrison's novel does something unprecedented makes it a tough match for "it exemplifies the prior stuff". However, the prior remarks include "writing has aspired to the condition of music, in which form contributes significantly to content", and that's exactly what's happening in Jazz. Since Morrison is using a musical genre as a structuring principle, the form is contributing to the content / the writing is aspiring to the condition of music. Realistically, I would probably leave this but not pick it on a first pass and only come home to it because other answers are broken and we can better make this work.

    Skill tested: Method · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Weak Match14% picked this

    from a description of a common claim about two art forms, to some specific evidence that supports that claim, to an inference regarding a

    The first ingredient seems okay? 1. the author introduces a historical tension between two different art forms a description of a common claim about two art forms Is there a common claim about literature and music? It's not saying that the two have something in common. It's saying they have always been rivals. I guess what they have in common is that they've always intruded on each other's terrain. Does the author then provide specific evidence that supports that "music and literature have always intruded on each other's terrain"? Not really. He says that literature has aspired to the condition of music, especially in the African American tradition. That's another weak match. When we compare the 2nd ingredient of (B) to the 2nd ingredient here, it seems like (B)'s is an easier, more accurate match (a similar observation about a particular tradition). Finally, does the author make an inference about a particular individual? No, the author just describes an individual who wrote a book that involves literature and music swirling together. The author doesn't infer that Toni Morrison was an writer who intruded on music's terrain. He just says she wrote a book that had an innovative way of blending the two. It feels like all 3 ingredients in this answer are stretchable if we had to, but we don't have to, because (B) provides easier to match language.

  4. Bad Match: specific art / more general6% picked this

    from an observation about a specific art form, to a more general claim about the applicability of that observation to other art forms, to

    Does the first paragraph start with an observation about a specific art form? The first sentence is about two specific art forms. We could ignore the first sentence and say that the author's 2nd sentence makes an observation about writing: "it has aspired to the condition of music". Does the author go to a more general claim about the applicability of that to other art forms? Definitely not. The claim was already about music, so there aren't any other art forms to apply that claim to. And the 2nd ingredient is getting more specific (not more general), about the music vs. literature tension within the African American tradition.

  5. Bad Match: the arts / counterexample6% picked this

    from general comments about the arts, to a purported counterexample to the general comments as applied to a particular artistic tradition, to a description

    There is no general comments about "the arts", just one specifically about two arts, music and literature. There is no counterexample. The author zooms into a particular artistic tradition (African American) by saying "nowhere is this truer than here". The first paragraph maintains the same theme and keeps zooming in two more layers of specificity.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free