Reading Comprehension

PT135 · S3 · P4 · Q25 Confronting Agricultural Overproduction in Europe

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

As part of an international effort to address environmental problems resulting from agricultural overproduction, hundreds of thousands of acres of surplus farmland throughout Europe will be taken out of production in coming years.

Topic

Restoring plant and microbial diversity to overfarmed European lands

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

Restoring plant diversity to overused farmland is challenging due to depleted soils and problematic weeds, but recent research suggests that success depends on restoring both a diverse mix of native plant seeds and beneficial soil microorganisms ("diversity underground fosters diversity aboveground"—final sentences of the last paragraph).

P1: The Challenge of Restoring Overfarmed Land

Europe is trying to take lots of farmland out of production for environmental reasons, but it’s hard to bring back natural plant life because years of farming deplete soil nutrients and create weed problems. You could replace the topsoil, but that’s just not possible at the scale needed. Typically, people assume nature will (very slowly) fix things on its own, but researchers are now testing ways to speed things along.

P2: Experimental Approaches to Plant Diversity

Researchers in the Netherlands set up a big experiment: they cleared a cornfield and divided it up, testing different combinations of native plant seeds. Where they planted a diverse mix of seeds, troublesome thistles disappeared, but if they did nothing, thistles took over. So, planting a broader range of native species helps keep out bad weeds.

P3: The Role of Microorganisms in Restoration

They also tested whether adding soil (full of microbes) from healthier land would help. Plots with the added soil did better than plain ones, but still not as well as untouched, long-restored land. The problem? Old farmland has too many disease organisms but not enough beneficial ones like mycorrhizal fungi, which protect the plants. In short, you need a good underground ecosystem to support a healthy one above. The researchers now think the best bet is to actively add both native seeds and beneficial microbes to the soil to speed up restoring these lands.

25.

In which one of the following circumstances would it be LEAST advantageous to use the methods researched in the Netherlands study in order to restore to its natural state a field that has been in constant agricultural use?

  1. The field's natural nutrients have

    Opposite

    This is a reason we would want to use the Netherlands methods, to help restore the soil to its natural state where it isn't depleted of natural nutrients.

    8% picked this

  2. Correct

    The field's topsoil can easily

    Why this is right

    We wanted to flip one of the identified causal factors that was creating the problem that the Netherlands study was designed to help solve. This answer is flipping the last one: - we don't want it back in its natural state - we didn't use lots of fertilizer - it's not dominated by thistles and weeds - it would be practical to just replace the topsoil Since we were told in the 1st paragraph that "the quickest way to restore heavily fertilized land is to remove and replace the topsoil", if that can be done "easily", as this answer says, then we have no need for the complex methods of the Netherlands study.

    Skill tested: Application · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    66% picked this

  3. The field has been heavily

    Opposite

    We wanted an answer that flipped one of these background factors of the Problem, but this answer is doing the opposite of the second thing in our list. - we don't want it back in its natural state - we didn't use lots of fertilizer - it's not dominated by thistles and weeds - it would be practical to just replace the topsoil

    8% picked this

  4. The field has the potential

    Unrelated to Support Window

    Whether or not the field can support plants such as rye has nothing to do with any of the background factors that led to the Problem that the Netherlands study is designed to address: - we want it back in its natural state - we used lots of fertilizer - it's dominated by thistles and weeds - it wouldn't be practical to just replace the topsoil

    8% picked this

  5. The field is adjacent to

    Unrelated to Support Window

    Whether or not the field is adjacent to an active corn field has nothing to do with any of the background factors that led to the Problem that the Netherlands study is designed to address: - we want it back in its natural state - we used lots of fertilizer - it's dominated by thistles and weeds - it wouldn't be practical to just replace the topsoil

    10% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free