Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT135 S3 P4 Q25 Explanation

Confronting Agricultural Overproduction in Europe

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsApplicationScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

As part of an international effort to address environmental problems resulting from agricultural overproduction, hundreds of thousands of acres of surplus farmland throughout Europe will be taken out of production in coming years. Restoring a natural balance of flora to this land will be difficult, however, because the nutrients in soil that of artificially accelerating the processes through which nature slowly reestablishes plant diversity on previously farmed land.

In the study, a former cornfield was raked to get rid of cornstalks and weeds, then divided into 20 plots of roughly equal size. Control plots were replanted with corn or sown with nothing at all. The remaining plots were divided into two groups: plots in one group were sown with a with fewer seed varieties. On the control plots that were left untouched, thistles have become dominant.

On some of the plots sown with seeds of native plant species, soil from nearby land that had been taken out of production 20 years earlier was scattered to see what effect introducing nematodes, fungi, and other beneficial microorganisms associated with later stages of natural soil development might have on the process microorganisms are “sown” systematically into the soil along with a wide variety of native plant seeds.

What this question is testing

Application

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
25.

In which one of the following circumstances would it be LEAST advantageous to use the methods researched in the Netherlands study in order to restore to its natural

Answer choices

  1. Opposite9% picked this

    The field's natural nutrients have been depleted

    This is a reason we would want to use the Netherlands methods, to help restore the soil to its natural state where it isn't depleted of natural nutrients.

  2. Correct63% picked this

    The field's topsoil can easily be removed

    Why this is right

    We wanted to flip one of the identified causal factors that was creating the problem that the Netherlands study was designed to help solve. This answer is flipping the last one: - we don't want it back in its natural state - we didn't use lots of fertilizer - it's not dominated by thistles and weeds - it would be practical to just replace the topsoil Since we were told in the 1st paragraph that "the quickest way to restore heavily fertilized land is to remove and replace the topsoil", if that can be done "easily", as this answer says, then we have no need for the complex methods of the Netherlands study.

    Skill tested: Application · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Opposite10% picked this

    The field has been heavily fertilized for

    We wanted an answer that flipped one of these background factors of the Problem, but this answer is doing the opposite of the second thing in our list. - we don't want it back in its natural state - we didn't use lots of fertilizer - it's not dominated by thistles and weeds - it would be practical to just replace the topsoil

  4. Unrelated to Support Window9% picked this

    The field has the potential to support commercial grass plants such

    Whether or not the field can support plants such as rye has nothing to do with any of the background factors that led to the Problem that the Netherlands study is designed to address: - we want it back in its natural state - we used lots of fertilizer - it's dominated by thistles and weeds - it wouldn't be practical to just replace the topsoil

  5. Unrelated to Support Window10% picked this

    The field is adjacent to other fields where corn is growing and will continue

    Whether or not the field is adjacent to an active corn field has nothing to do with any of the background factors that led to the Problem that the Netherlands study is designed to address: - we want it back in its natural state - we used lots of fertilizer - it's dominated by thistles and weeds - it wouldn't be practical to just replace the topsoil

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free