Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT135 S2 Q22 Explanation

Most economists believe

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Most economists believe that reducing the price of any product generally stimulates demand for it. However, most wine merchants have found that reducing the price of domestic wines to make them more competitive with imported wines with which they were an increase in sales of those imported wines.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
22.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to reconcile the belief of most economists with the consequences observed

Answer choices

  1. Deepens the Paradox11% picked this

    Economists' studies of the prices of grocery items and their rates of sales rarely

    This makes it less clear how the economists’ belief is consistent with the consequences observed by most wine merchants.

  2. Out of Scope1% picked this

    Few merchants of any kind have detailed knowledge of economic theories about the relationship between item

    The issue is the economists’ belief, while this is about the wine merchants’ understanding of economic theory.

  3. Out of Scope15% picked this

    Consumers are generally willing to forgo purchasing other items they desire in order to purchase

    The statements do not indicate whether domestic wine or imported wine is superior.

  4. Deepens the Paradox9% picked this

    Imported wines in all price ranges are comparable in quality to domestic wines

    This makes it less clear why an increase in sales of domestic wines would boost sales of imported wines.

  5. Correct63% picked this

    An increase in the demand for a consumer product is compatible with an increase in demand

    Why this is right

    This does not explain how the increased demand for domestic wines might boost demand for imported wines. But the question stem only called the right answer to reconcile the economists’ belief with the consequences observed by most wine merchants.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free