Principle: If an insurance policy

Answer choices

1. A

   Weak Match5% picked this

   Celia is a reasonable person, and she expected the insurance policy to cover hail damage

   The rule stipulates that it's both a reasonable person and a reasonable expectation. One does not imply the other, since reasonable people sometimes have unreasonable expectations. And this answer doesn't address whether the insurance policy was written in a way that discouraged reading it.

   5%
2. B

   Correct76% picked this

   Given the way it was written, a reasonable person would not have read Celia's insurance policy thoroughly before signing it, and Celia reasonably expected

   Why this is right

   This satisfied all of our needs: - the insurance policy had to be written in a way that no reasonable person would have read it thoroughly before signing it. "Given the way it's written, reasonable wouldn't read ..." - it must be the reasonable expectations of a policyholder concerning the policy's coverage that, "hail damage is covered by this policy" "Celia reasonably expected hail coverage"

   Skill tested: Principle-Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

   76%
3. C

   Bad #2 Match2% picked this

   The insurance policy that Celia signed was written in such a way that a reasonable person would not read it thoroughly before signing it,

   1. the insurance policy had to be written in a way that no reasonable person would have read it thoroughly before signing it. Looking good, the first half matches up. - it must be the reasonable expectations of a policyholder concerning the policy's coverage that, "hail damage is covered by this policy" If she thoroughly read the policy before signing it, then it would be unreasonable for her to have expected hail coverage, since there was specific language in the policy she thoroughly read that excluded hail coverage.

   2%
4. D

   Missing #112% picked this

   Celia did not read the insurance policy thoroughly before signing it, and a reasonable person in her position would assume that the

   1. the insurance policy had to be written in a way that no reasonable person would have read it thoroughly before signing it. No information provided about whether this is the sort of policy where there "don't have to read it / reasonable expectations are honored" applies. - it must be the reasonable expectations of a policyholder concerning the policy's coverage that, "hail damage is covered by this policy"

   12%
5. E

   Missing #25% picked this

   Celia did not read the written insurance policy thoroughly before signing it, and a reasonable person in her position would

   - the insurance policy had to be written in a way that no reasonable person would have read it thoroughly before signing it. Cool, we establish that reasonable people wouldn't read it, just like Celia didn't. - it must be the reasonable expectations of a policyholder concerning the policy's coverage that, "hail damage is covered by this policy" Nothing is established about whether it was reasonable to expect hail coverage.

   5%