Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT133 S1 Q14 Explanation

Waller: If there were really

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsAgree/Disagree

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Waller: If there were really such a thing as extrasensory perception, it would generally be accepted by the public since anyone with extrasensory powers would be able to convince the general public of its existence by clearly demonstrating those have such powers would achieve wealth and renown.

Chin: It's impossible to demonstrate anything to the satisfaction of all skeptics. So long as the cultural elite remains closed-minded to the possibility of extrasensory perception, the popular media reports, and biased in favor of such skeptics.

What this question is testing

Agree/Disagree

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Waller's and Chin's statements commit them to disagreeing

Answer choices

  1. Neither Comments1% picked this

    extrasensory perception is a real

    This was all hypothetical, so we don't know either author's stance on whether ESP actually exists.

  2. Too Strong47% picked this

    extrasensory perception, if it were a real phenomenon, could be demonstrated to the satisfaction

    We know that Chin would disagree with this, as he does explicitly in his first sentence. However, we don't have support that Waller would agree to this incredibly extreme claim. She believes that ESP, if real, could be accepted by the general public, but that's a much lower bar than "convincing to all skeptics".

  3. Trap3% picked this

    skeptics about extrasensory perception have a

    Neither Commits Out of Scope: Weak Case These were hypothetical statements about how people would react. There was nothing evaluative about ESP or how the general public would react. So we have no idea whether either author would consider skeptics of ESP to currently have a weak case.

  4. Correct45% picked this

    the failure of the general public to believe in extrasensory perception is good evidence

    Why this is right

    Brutal! We might want to look at this in conditional-argument form. The PREMISE is good evidence of the CONCLUSION. Turning this argument into conditional form: General pub fails to accept ESP → ESP does not exist Contrapositive? ESP exists → General pub accepts ESP Okay, well Waller definitely agreed with that contrapositive; that sounds like his very first claim. And as we examined before, Chin disagreed with that very first claim. So we can say that Waller would agree to this answer and Chin would disagree. More conversationally, Chin would disagree by saying, "the fact that the public doesn't believe in ESP isn't good evidence that ESP doesn't exist. It's only good evidence that the elite don't believe in ESP, because the elite influence the media which influences the general public.

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Both Disagree4% picked this

    the general public believes that extrasensory perception is a

    While not explicitly stated, it seems like both authors would agree that the general public is not currently believing in ESP. Waller wouldn't formulate a hypothetical that said, "if ESP were real, the general public would believe it" if the general public already believes it.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free