A large company has been convicted of engaging in monopolistic practices.
Opposing Evidence
The penalty imposed on the company will probably have little if any effect on its behavior.
Premise
A large company has been convicted of engaging in monopolistic practices.
The information provided by the trial has emboldened the company’s direct competitors, alerted potential rivals, and forced the company to restrain its unfair behavior toward customers and competitors.
Intermediate Conclusion
The trial provided useful information about the company’s practices.
Main Conclusion
The trial was worthwhile.