Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT131 S2 Q25 Explanation

About 3 billion years ago

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

About 3 billion years ago, the Sun was only 80 percent as luminous as it is currently. Such conditions today would result in the freezing of Earth's oceans, but geological evidence shows that water rather than ice filled the oceans at that time. Heat is trapped within Earth's atmosphere through the presence the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was significantly higher then than it is today.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
25.

Which one of the following, if true, weakens

Answer choices

  1. Strengthens / Opposite11% picked this

    Sufficient heat to keep the oceans liquid 3 billion years ago could not have been generated through geological

    This rules out a different way for the dimmer Sun to coexist with a liquid ocean.

  2. Correct57% picked this

    Geological studies indicate that there is much less methane in Earth's atmosphere today than there was

    Why this is right

    This lets us say, "Yes, author, there was a higher level of greenhouse gases 3 billion years ago, but that's because there was more methane, not because there was more CO2".

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Strengthens / Opposite13% picked this

    Geological evidence indicates that the oceans contained greater amounts of dissolved minerals 3 billion years ago, but not enough to

    Like choice (A), this rules out a different way that the dimmer Sun could coexist with liquid oceans.

  4. Out of Scope6% picked this

    The increase in the Sun's luminosity over the past 3 billion years roughly coincided with an increasing complexity

    Out of Scope: "increasing complexity of life" Nobody cares about the complexity of life, (D). We're just trying to solve the mystery of "how were the oceans still liquid if the Sun was dimmer?"

  5. Strengthens, if Anything14% picked this

    Because the distance from Earth to the Sun has not changed significantly over the last 3 billion years, the increase in the Sun's luminosity

    If the Sun were previously closer to the Earth, so that 80% as luminous still meant we were getting the same level of radiation we do nowadays, then that would have been an alternate explanation for how a dimmer Sun could coexist with a liquid ocean. But this answer rules out that possibility.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free