Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT130 S4 Q23 Explanation

Eight large craters run

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Eight large craters run in a long straight line across a geographical region. Although some of the craters contain rocks that have undergone high-pressure shocks characteristic of meteorites slamming into Earth, these shocks could also have been caused by extreme volcanic events. Because of the linearity of the craters, it is very all different ages, they were probably caused by volcanic events rather than meteorites.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

Which one of the following statements, if true, would most strengthen

Answer choices

  1. Too Weak16% picked this

    A similar but shorter line of craters that are all the same age is known to have been

    This example is not similar enough to support the conclusion since the these craters are all of the same age.

  2. Correct49% picked this

    No known natural cause would likely account for eight meteorite craters of different ages forming

    Why this is right

    This makes it unlikely that the craters were formed by meteorites and more likely that they craters were formed by volcanic events.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Weaken2% picked this

    There is no independent evidence of either meteorites or volcanic activity in the region where

    This makes it less likely that the craters were caused by volcanic events.

  4. Weaken4% picked this

    There is no independent evidence of a volcanic event strong enough to have created the high­ pressure shocks that are characteristic

    This makes it less likely that the craters were caused by volcanic events.

  5. Out of Scope29% picked this

    No known single meteor shower has created exactly eight impact craters that form

    The craters discussed in the argument are of different ages, while this is about eight craters of the same age.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free