Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT130 S2 P4 Q23 Explanation

Musical Emotions

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAnalogyHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A In music, a certain complexity of sounds can be expected to have a positive effect on the listener. A single, pure tone is not that interesting to explore; a measure of intricacy is required to excite human curiosity. Sounds that are too complex or disorganized, however, tend to principle that connects the various sounds and makes them comprehensible.

In this respect, music is like human language. Single sounds are in most cases not sufficient to convey meaning in speech, whereas when put together in a sequence they form words and sentences. Likewise, if the tones in music are not perceived to be tied together sequentially or rhythmically—for likely to feel any emotional connection or to show appreciation.

Certain music can also have a relaxing effect. The fact that such music tends to be continuous and rhythmical suggests a possible explanation for this effect. In a natural environment, danger tends to be accompanied by sudden, unexpected sounds. Thus, a background of constant noise suggests peaceful conditions; discontinuous sounds demand more A continuous sound, particularly one that is judged to be safe, relaxes the brain.

Passage B There are certain elements within music, such as a change of melodic line or rhythm, that create expectations about the future development of the music. The expectation the listener has about the further course of musical events is a key determinant for the experience of “musical emotions.” Music creates expectations the more intense the emotions that will be experienced. When resolution occurs, relaxation follows.

The interruption of the expected musical course, depending on one’s personal involvement, causes the search for an explanation. This results from a “mismatch” between one’s musical expectation and the actual course of the music. Negative emotions will be the result experience. Positive emotions result if the converse happens.

When we listen to music, we take into account factors such as the complexity and novelty of the music. The degree to which the music sounds familiar determines whether the music is experienced as pleasurable or uncomfortable. The pleasure experienced is minimal when the music is entirely new to the listener, increases for complex melodies than will a naïve listener, as the threshold for experiencing emotion is higher.

What this question is testing

Analogy

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

Which one of the following describes a preference that is most analogous to the preference mentioned in the first

Answer choices

  1. Bad Match14% picked this

    the preference of some people for falling asleep to white noise, such as the sound

    This is saying people like white noise, but white noise is a constant drone/hum. It would match up with the "too simple" category. We need a better match for middle-ground complexity and variation, with some coherent thru-line.

  2. Correct84% picked this

    the preference of many moviegoers for movies with plots that are clear and

    Why this is right

    This is mainly reinforcing the last two sentences of the first paragraph. If something is too complex or disorganized, be it a piece of music or an overly complicated movie plot that makes you feel lost 1/2 way through, we don't like it. Instead, we prefer a "comprehensible principle connecting the various sounds". We prefer a "comprehensible (easy to follow) plot that connects the various parts of the movie".

    Skill tested: Analogy · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Bad Match1% picked this

    the preference of many diners for restaurants that serve

    We're looking for something showing we prefer a middle ground between two simple and too complex. This answer is saying we prefer large portions, which doesn't have anything to do with simplicity vs. complexity. You could have a large portion of one-note mashed potatoes or a large portion of incredibly complex gumbo.

  4. Bad Match Topic Trap1% picked this

    the preference of many young listeners for fast music over

    Any time we're doing Parallel questions in LR or Analogy questions in RC, we should be wary of picking answers that are very close in topic to the original. That's a time-honored way for LSAC to write a trap answer. They're trying to reward people for seeing a deeper principle / pattern / relationship at play in both the answer and the original. Meanwhile, they're trying to trap people into picking a superficial similarity in topic. We're looking for something showing we prefer a middle ground between two simple and too complex. This answer is saying we prefer fast over slower, which doesn't have a clear link to simplicity vs. complexity. Generally, it's fair to say that fast music could be more complicated in the sense of more notes per second, but a lot of fast styles of music like ska and punk are not very complex, and some slow music like cool jazz can be very complex. Also, to match our Goldilocks preference, wouldn't we prefer medium paced music as the middle-ground between too slow and too fast?

  5. Bad Match0% picked this

    the preference of most children for sweet foods over

    We're looking for something showing we prefer a middle ground between two simple and too complex. This answer is saying we prefer sweet over bitter, which doesn't have a strong connection simplicity vs. complexity. Sweet and bitter are both simple flavors. Bittersweet is a more complex flavor.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free