Reading Comprehension

PT130 · S2 · P1 · Q1 Advances in Archaeology

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Traditional sources of evidence about ancient history are archaeological remains and surviving texts.

Topic

How researchers have learned about ancient textiles and the women who produced them despite the limitations of traditional evidence.

Framework

Problem/Solution. The passage opens with the obstacles facing the study of ancient textile production, then walks through several ways researchers have nonetheless made progress.

Main Point

Despite the perishable nature of cloth and the silence of ancient texts, researchers have learned a great deal about ancient textiles and their makers by combining technological advances, a new preservationist mindset in archaeology, and reconstruction of ancient production methods.

P1: The obstacles, plus a thesis

Cloth perishes; loom weights looked like blobs of clay and were thrown away; ancient texts barely mention textile-making and use archaic terms when they do. Yet — and this is the thesis — researchers have learned a great deal anyway, by piecing together disparate sources.

P2: Technology + a philosophical shift

Modern methods (radiocarbon dating, infrared photography, isotope fingerprinting, thin-layer chromatography) extract information from minute remains. Archaeology itself has shifted from artifact-collecting to scientific inquiry, with a new precept of preserving everything — which is how a 5,000-year-old linen shirt was found in a previously stored Petrie collection.

P3: Recreating ancient production

Researchers have advanced the field by reconstructing ancient production methods — confirming, for example, that those clay blobs were loom weights, and resolving which of two Athena statues received the festival dress (the small one, since at ancient looms the dress would have taken nine months for the small statue, not the large one as previously assumed).

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

Archaeology is an expanding discipline
Wrong Emphasis
Wrong Emphasis (archaeology) Unsupported Causality (women's history) The passage is about studying ancient textiles, not about archaeology as a discipline broadly. Archaeology's philosophical shift is mentioned in P2 only as one of the developments that helped textile research. There is also no mention of "increasing interest in women's history" as a driver of change.
4% picked this
Correct
A diversity of new approaches
Why this is right
This is a pretty good match for the final sentence of P1. "enabled researchers to infer much" is a great match for "researchers have learned a great deal". "the history of textiles and their creators" is a great match for "ancient textiles and those who made them". Was there a diversity of new approaches? Sure, there radiocarbon dating, infrared photography, isotope fingerprinting, and recreations of cloth using old technology and methods.
Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
58% picked this
Despite many obstacles, research into
Too Narrow
Reconstruction of ancient equipment and production techniques is the topic of P3 only — it is one of several approaches the passage describes, not the headline. The rest of this answer is super lovable, but it makes the signature achievement "being able to replicate old equipment and production techniques". Meanwhile, the passage wasn't saying that was a noteworthy accomplishment itself, rather it was an important means to an end. Recreating old equipment and techniques is one of the new ways that we've learned a lot. The "we've learned a lot" sentiment is the signature achievement of the passage.
18% picked this
Research into the history of
Wrong View
The passage describes archaeology's philosophical shift as something that helped textile research, not the other way around. There is no claim that textile research drove sweeping changes in archaeology. This answer reverses the direction of influence.
19% picked this
Though researchers have verified certain
Too Strong
The passage presents technology, the preservation ethic, and reconstruction as complementary approaches that together advanced the field. It never claims that "most significant findings" came specifically from reconstruction rather than from the other methods. P3 isn't elevated in importance over P2. It's just an addition. "The history of textiles has also advanced on a different front".
2% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free