Reading Comprehension

PT13 · S3 · P3 · Q18 Watteau

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Late-nineteenth-century books about the French artist Watteau (1684–1721) betray a curious blind spot: more than any single artist before or since, Watteau provided his age with an influential image of itself, and nineteenth-century writers accepted this image as genuine.

Topic

Watteau's art and its misleading influence on later perceptions of eighteenth-century French society.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Nineteenth-century writers and art lovers took Watteau's idealized images of eighteenth-century France as genuine reflections of that era, but this image was more fantasy than reality; they ignored (or bent) the historical facts to maintain this appealing but inaccurate association. Most Valuable Sentence: The first paragraph, especially the clause:

P1: The Watteau Image and Its Enduring Influence

Nineteenth-century writers adopted an idealized image of Watteau's France, based largely on engraved reproductions of his art, which popularized a charming vision of eighteenth-century society that was widely copied—even though it didn't match reality.

P2: The Reality of Watteau's Historical Context

Despite the nostalgic, cheerful vision associated with Watteau's art, his actual life took place during especially hard times in France, including frequent wars, invasions, and natural disasters.

P3: How Later Admirers Ignored or Rationalized Reality

Most nineteenth-century admirers ignored the harsh historical context, or only acknowledged it to argue against the idea that art is shaped solely by circumstance—yet even those who recognized the disconnect clung to the myth, suggesting instead that Watteau "foresaw" the France that came after him in his paintings.

18.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author’s view of Watteau’s works differs most significantly from that of most late-nineteenth-century Watteau admirers in which one of the following ways?

  1. Unlike most late-nineteenth-century Watteau admirers,

    Contradicted: unlike admirers

    This doesn't even make sense ... this answer is saying that "Watteau admirers do not appreciate the important of Watteau's artistic accomplishments".

    1% picked this

  2. The author finds Watteau’s works

    Wrong Disagreement

    The author never objects that Watteau was not lyrical or charming. She is just saying that being lyrical and charming is not a correct personification of France during Watteau's time. She thinks his art was a mismatch for his time period, whereas admirers think that it is a personification of the time period.

    9% picked this

  3. Correct

    In contrast to most late-nineteenth-century

    Why this is right

    The admirers think that Watteau's art personifies the time he lived in, whereas our author says in the first paragraph that Watteau's images "bore little relationship to reality". The 2nd paragraph is all about how the decades of Watteau's artistic period were "fairly calamitous ones" in France. The 3rd paragraph begins by saying that "admirers simply ignored the grim background of the works they found so lyrical and charming".

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    72% picked this

  4. The author is much more

    Wrong Disagreement

    The admirers often use Watteau as a way to refute the idea of determinism, and our author finds their logic pretty dumb because they're ignoring pretty obvious known facts that conflict with the narratives they've created. But that doesn't mean our author is wanting us to consider deterministic explanations of the origins of Watteau's works. We can say, "Your argument for X is pretty dumb" without meaning, "I think we should be arguing not-X."

    17% picked this

  5. Unlike most late-nineteenth-century admirers of

    Too Strong: impossible / any

    Our author is only writing that Watteau is a curious case where his admirers think of his art as personifying / representing a particular historical period in France, even though it doesn't. But that doesn't mean our author holds the extreme position that "it is impossible for any work of art to personify a historical time period."

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free