Reading Comprehension

PT13 · S3 · P3 · Q17 Watteau

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Late-nineteenth-century books about the French artist Watteau (1684–1721) betray a curious blind spot: more than any single artist before or since, Watteau provided his age with an influential image of itself, and nineteenth-century writers accepted this image as genuine.

Topic

Watteau's art and its misleading influence on later perceptions of eighteenth-century French society.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Nineteenth-century writers and art lovers took Watteau's idealized images of eighteenth-century France as genuine reflections of that era, but this image was more fantasy than reality; they ignored (or bent) the historical facts to maintain this appealing but inaccurate association. Most Valuable Sentence: The first paragraph, especially the clause:

P1: The Watteau Image and Its Enduring Influence

Nineteenth-century writers adopted an idealized image of Watteau's France, based largely on engraved reproductions of his art, which popularized a charming vision of eighteenth-century society that was widely copied—even though it didn't match reality.

P2: The Reality of Watteau's Historical Context

Despite the nostalgic, cheerful vision associated with Watteau's art, his actual life took place during especially hard times in France, including frequent wars, invasions, and natural disasters.

P3: How Later Admirers Ignored or Rationalized Reality

Most nineteenth-century admirers ignored the harsh historical context, or only acknowledged it to argue against the idea that art is shaped solely by circumstance—yet even those who recognized the disconnect clung to the myth, suggesting instead that Watteau "foresaw" the France that came after him in his paintings.

17.

The phrase “curious blind spot” (first paragraph) can best be interpreted as referring to which one of the following?

  1. some biographers’ persistent inability to

    Wrong Ending

    This answer would be great if it said "Some biographers' persistent inability to appreciate how crappy life in France was during Watteau's time".

    4% picked this

  2. Correct

    certain writers’ surprising lack of

    Why this is right

    These writers lack awareness that France was definitely not a happy-go-lucky place to live during Watteau's life. As the author points out, there was war and famine aplenty during Watteau's time in France. Does the author characterize this lack of awareness as surprising or this discrepancy as obvious? In the 2nd to last sentence of the first paragraph, we have decent support: [Watteau's] engravings presented aristocratic 18th century French society with an image of itself that was highly acceptable and widely imitated by other artists, however little relationship that image bore to reality. The author highlights the mismatch between the perception of France at its finest and the reality of Watteau's experience of France, in the 2nd paragraph: - the decades of this artistic activity were fairly calamitous ones - France was continually at war, threatened by siege, and experienced a disastrous famine. The beginning of the 3rd paragraph says that these writers, - ignored the grim background - found the historical facts inconvenient

    Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    68% picked this

  3. some writers’ willful refusal to

    Out of Scope: valuable source

    We could fix this answer by saying, "some writers' willful refusal to evaluate properly the actual conditions of France during Watteau's lifetime". But this answer is saying there is some valuable source of information about the past that the author identifies. What is that source? A book? A play? Archaeological findings? There's no one source of information ever spotlighted. Rather, the author is just saying, "If you look up information about France during those years, you'll see it was not a utopian delight."

    22% picked this

  4. an inexplicable tendency on the

    Out of Scope: undervalue

    These writers love Watteau, so the author is definitely not saying that they undervalue him. The author is saying their blind spot is that they undervalue how much misery and turmoil permeated France during Watteau's lifetime.

    4% picked this

  5. a marked bias in favor

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: prejudice against others Too Strong: equally talented The author is never saying, "These guys love Watteau so much, that they fail to appreciate other artists, X, Y, and Z, who also painted during that period and are just as good." The author is saying, "These guys love Watteau's joyful paintings so much that they want to believe that France was really like those paintings in those days."

    2% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free