Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT13 S2 Q7 Explanation

It is not correct that the people

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsFlaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

It is not correct that the people of the United States, relative to comparable countries, are the most lightly taxed. True, the United States has the lowest tax, as percent of gross domestic product, of the Western industrialized countries, but tax rates alone do not tell the whole story. People in the but private health-care expenditures represent another 7 percent. This 7 percent, then, amounts to a tax.

What this question is testing

Flaw

Conclusion

The author wants to push back on the idea that Americans are the most lightly taxed people in the West.

Evidence

Yes, U.S. taxes are the lowest as a percent of GDP. But Americans pay out of pocket for things — like health care — that other countries cover with tax dollars. The author says the 7% of GDP Americans spend on private health care "amounts to a tax."

Evaluate

Watch the move closely. The author is calling private health-care spending a tax. But a tax is, by definition, money you pay to the government, not your insurance company or doctor. The author is stretching the word "tax" to make the comparison work.

It's like arguing that car payments are basically a tax because they're a recurring expense — sure, both come out of your wallet, but that doesn't make them the same kind of thing.

Goal

The right answer will say the argument inflates or extends the meaning of a key term.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
7.

The argument concerning whether the people of the United States are the most lightly taxed is most vulnerable to which one

Answer choices

  1. Bad Description16% picked this

    It bases a comparison on percentages rather than on

    The argument uses percentages of GDP, but using percentages isn't the flaw — both sides of the comparison (U.S. tax burden and U.S. health spending) are expressed as percentages of GDP, making them comparable. The flaw lies in calling private health spending a "tax," not in the choice of percentages over absolute numbers.

  2. Correct60% picked this

    It unreasonably extends the application of a

    Why this is right

    This nails the move. The argument takes the word "tax" — which ordinarily refers to a compulsory payment to a government — and extends it to private health-care spending, which is neither a payment to government nor compulsory in the same sense. The conclusion ("the U.S. is not the most lightly taxed") only follows if we accept that stretched usage. That extension of the key term is unreasonable, and it's exactly what makes the argument vulnerable.

    Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Inappropriate Appeals1% picked this

    It uses negatively charged language instead of attempting to give

    The argument is presented in fairly neutral, statistical terms. It doesn't lean on emotionally loaded or pejorative language to push the conclusion — it leans on numbers and a redefined key term. The flaw is conceptual, not rhetorical.

  4. Sampling9% picked this

    It generalizes from only a few

    The argument uses health care as an illustrative example, but it doesn't conclude broadly from "a few instances." The conclusion is about the U.S. tax burden specifically, supported by a single case (health care) that the author treats as decisive on its own. The flaw is treating that case as a tax through redefinition, not generalizing too quickly from too few examples.

  5. Bad Description13% picked this

    It sets up a dichotomy between alternatives that are

    The argument doesn't set up a false either/or between non-exclusive options. It compares the U.S. with other Western industrialized countries on tax burden, an actual comparison, not a forced binary. The flaw lies in the redefinition of "tax," not in the framing of alternatives.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free