Educators studied the performance of 200 students in a university's history classes.
Apparent Paradox
Educators studied the performance of 200 students in a university’s history classes.
They found that those students who performed the best had either part-time jobs of full-time jobs, had their history classes early in the morning, and had a very limited social life.
Whereas, the those students who performed the worst had no jobs, had their history classes early in the morning, and had a very active social life.
Evaluate
Both the best and worst performers had their classes in the morning. The differences between the groups are the extent of their social life and whether they had a job. Both activities consume time making it harder to study. So why does one group perform better than the other. It must be that lost time to work does not impede study time to the extent that an active social life does.