Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT129 S3 Q1 Explanation

Educators studied the performance

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Educators studied the performance of 200 students in a university's history classes. They found that those students who performed the best had either part-time jobs or full-time jobs, had their history classes early in the morning, and had a very limited social life, whereas those students who performed the in the morning, and had a very active social life.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
1.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the

Answer choices

  1. Correct88% picked this

    The students compensated for any study time lost due to their jobs but they did not compensate for any study time lost

    Why this is right

    This shows how work does not impede study time as much as an active social life does.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Deepens the Paradox2% picked this

    The students who had full-time jobs typically worked late-night hours at

    This makes it harder to understand how the students with jobs performed better than those who did not.

  3. Applies to Both3% picked this

    Better students tend to choose classes that are scheduled to meet early

    To explain a difference an answer cannot apply equally to both groups.

  4. Half Scope3% picked this

    A larger percentage of those students interested in majoring in history had part-time jobs than

    This may reduce the load on those history students with jobs, but it doesn’t explain why those with jobs performed better in class than those with an active social life.

  5. Applies to Both4% picked this

    Although having a job tends to provide a release from stress, thus increasing academic performance, having a full-time job, like having an active social

    This applies to both groups so it cannot explain the difference in outcomes.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free