Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT129 S2 Q26 Explanation

Historian: Flavius, an ancient Roman

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsFlaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Historian: Flavius, an ancient Roman governor who believed deeply in the virtues of manual labor and moral temperance, actively sought to discourage the arts by removing state financial support for them. Also, Flavius was widely unpopular among his subjects, as we can plays that were written about him during his administration.

What this question is testing

Flaw

Your task

Describe the reasoning error the argument actually commits.

Common trap

Answers that name a real logical flaw the argument doesn't actually make.

Winning move

Articulate the gap in the reasoning yourself, then match it to the choice that describes that gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
26.

The historian's argumentation is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds

Answer choices

  1. Too Weak3% picked this

    fails to consider the percentage of plays written during Flavius's administration that were not

    This does not provide information that weakens the argument.

  2. Correct89% picked this

    treats the satirical plays as a reliable indicator of Flavius's popularity despite potential bias on the

    Why this is right

    This points to the possible unrepresentative sample that playwrights make up when comparing to Flavius’ subjects more generally.

    Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Contradiction2% picked this

    presumes, without providing evidence, that Flavius was unfavorably disposed toward

    The argument does provide evidence that Flavius was unfavorably disposed toward the arts—he ended state financial support for the arts.

  4. Out of Scope3% picked this

    takes for granted that Flavius's attempt to discourage the arts

    Whether or not Flavius was successful at discouraging the arts is not relevant to the argument.

  5. Too Weak2% picked this

    fails to consider whether manual labor and moral temperance were widely regarded as virtues

    This does not provide information that weakens the argument.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free