Anderson maintains that travel writing

Answer choices

1. A

   Out of Scope: "result"1% picked this

   It is claimed to be a result of good

   The author doesn’t say that good travel writing causes anything other than “to show readers a place and make them see it anew”.

   1%
2. B

   Out of Scope: "wider readership"2% picked this

   It is cited as evidence that contemporary travel writing is intended for

   The author never says that modern travel writing is intended for a wider readership.

   2%
3. C

   Trap5% picked this

   It is part of a purported explanation of why readers are disappointed with

   Wrong Role / Out of Scope: "readers are disappointed" We know that Anderson is disappointed, but we’re never told that readers are. This claim is part of a purported explanation for why it’s harder to do good travel writing nowadays than in previous times.

   5%
4. D

   Unsupported Relationship9% picked this

   It is cited as a reason that travel writing flourishes more today than it has

   Unsupported Relationship: "better-traveled public → better travel writing" The author isn’t saying that a better-traveled public is why travel writing has flourished. He says that a better-traveled public is why travel writing is harder than ever. And he says that the talent of today’s practitioners is why travel writing has flourished.

   9%
5. E

   Correct84% picked this

   It is cited as a condition that has transformed the task of

   Why this is right

   “Today, travel writers face a challenge far greater” is partially explained by the claim that today’s general public is better traveled than in the past.

   Skill tested: Role · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

   84%