Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT128 S4 P1 Q6 Explanation

New Zealand's Wool Growers

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsPrincipleSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The 50 million sheep of New Zealand outnumber its people 13 to 1, the highest such ratio in the world. At the wool industry's peak, in the 1950s, the wool growers of New Zealand delivered well over a third of that country's total export revenues. Yet this figure has declined drastically, as beef, lamb, milk, butter, cheese, fish, fruit, and wood and pulp as an agricultural export earner.

Rather than raising wool prices, the only reliable route to profitability lies, as in any agricultural enterprise, in improving productivity. New Zealand's commercial sheep farmers need to achieve the same kind of annual productivity gains that manufacturers of synthetic materials have recorded. This goal could readily be achieved if the industry as practices of the country's leading (and comfortably profitable) wool growers.

Gains on the order of those achieved by the world's cotton growers—who on average have been improving productivity at several times the rate of wool growers—can come wholly through better farm management. At present, wool growing in New Zealand, like agriculture everywhere, is deeply divided. On the one side are professional operations side are family farmers willing to receive a substantially lower return to maintain their lifestyle.

To encourage increased overall productivity, the establishment of a commercial genetic research company (which would concentrate on genetic selection for crossbreeding sheep, not on the artificial manipulation of genetic material in individual sheep) is recommended. This would represent a shift in spending away from industry efforts to improve the efficiency of wool the country's average sheep, and these superior sheep can be identified and kept as breeding stock.

What this question is testing

Principle

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

Which one of the following principles is most clearly operative in the author's reasoning

Answer choices

  1. Correct75% picked this

    An industry that seeks to increase its overall productivity should adopt, on an industry-wide basis, the techniques used

    Why this is right

    This seems to vibe pretty well with what we were thinking. The universal/categorial language of "an industry that is X should do Y" would mean "If you're X, then you should do Y". industry seeking to should have whole increase overall ? industry adopt techniques profitability of most prod members The trigger and the outcome match language in the 2nd paragraph, where the author establishes her main point recommendation: the only reliable route to profitability lies in improving productivity ... this goal could be readily achieved if the industry as a whole were to adopt the techniques of the country's leading wool growers.

    Skill tested: Principle · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Out of Scope1% picked this

    Increasing the overall productivity of an industry ought to involve requiring the industry's leading members to give aid to

    Out of Scope: required to give aid There's nothing in this passage that involves forcing the leading members to give aid to the industry's less productive members. Sure, the author is telling the less productive members to copy the techniques of the most successful ones, but she's recommending parts of their techniques that are common knowledge, not proprietary secrets. The passage isn't ever suggesting that the leading growers need to share proprietary business practices with the fledgling growers in order to assist them.

  3. Bad Evidence / Conclusion Match5% picked this

    Even if an industry has successfully increased its productivity, it should continue to explore new

    This principle is about an industry that has successfully increased its productivity, but the passage is about the wool industry, whose profits have been in decline. So that half doesn't match the passage, and then the other half about "exploring new avenues for reducing costs" doesn't match anything either. Yes, reducing costs is one way to increase profitability, but the passage never talks about it. The author is talking about increasing productivity (getting more value per unit of time), which can come about other ways as well (such as using premium breeding stock so that the eventual wool can sell for a higher price).

  4. Out of Scope: competing industries18% picked this

    An industry whose productivity is declining should model its business practices on those of its

    The wool industry's profitability is declining (it doesn't say its productivity is). But the bigger problem is that the main point of the passage is the author's recommendation that the wool industry model its business practices on those of its most successful wool-makers. This is saying "model your business practices on a competing industry." The passage wasn't saying, "The wool industry to copy the cotton industry's business practices". It was saying, "The wool industry can achieve the same boost in productivity that the cotton growers achieved, if the wool industry models its business practices on the most successful wool-growers."

  5. Opposite Conclusion1% picked this

    If an industry's productivity is declining, then that industry should return to the practices it employed at the

    The trigger here potentially applies to the wool industry (we know at least that profitability is declining). But the outcome is saying that the wool industry should go back to the practices they employed in their heyday. The actual advice the author had was that the wool industry should "adopt the management and breeding practices of the country's leading wool growers". The wool industry by enlarge is probably still using the practices it employed at its 1950s apex. The problem is that synthetics have since been invented and driven down the price of clean strong wool. In order to compete with synthetics, the author thinks the industry needs to change / modernize its techniques.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free