Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT128 S3 Q21 Explanation

Musicologist: Ludwig van Beethoven began

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Musicologist: Ludwig van Beethoven began losing his hearing when he was 30. This loss continued gradually, but was not complete until late in his life. While it may seem that complete hearing loss would be a severe liability for a composer, in a wonderfully introspective quality that his earlier music lacked.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
21.

Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the

Answer choices

  1. Unknown Comparison: more difficult0% picked this

    It was more difficult for Beethoven to compose his later works than

    Nothing in the paragraph talks about how difficult it was / wasn't for Beethoven to compose. The only way in which we can compare his later works to his earlier ones is that the former have more of a wonderful introspective quality than the latter do.

  2. Too Strong: poorer1% picked this

    Had he not lost his hearing, Beethoven's later music would have been of poorer quality

    We know one way in which the later music was better due to hearing loss: it had a wonderful introspective quality it didn't have before. But the passage doesn't indicate that the later music is, on the whole, better quality. Although it might be better when it comes to introspective quality, it might be worse on many other levels. This answer would be totally fine if it said, "Had he not lost his hearing, B's later music would have had less of an introspective quality than it has." It's also worth noting that if (B) were true, then (E) would also be true (if it's of poorer quality, then it's clearly different, so that disqualifies (B) from being correct. there can't be two correct answers)

  3. Music vs. Person10% picked this

    Had he not lost his hearing, Beethoven would have been less introspective

    Whoa, this is very close to what we just said for (B). This answer would be totally fine if it said, "Had he not lost his hearing, Beethoven's later music would have been less introspective than it was". But this says that Beethoven would have been less introspective. That's different.

  4. Relative vs. Absolute27% picked this

    Beethoven's music became gradually more introspective as he

    We know Beethoven gradually lost hearing. It wasn't until late in life that he completely lost hearing. And we know that "in Beethoven's case, complete hearing loss gave his later music a wonderfully introspective quality". So we know that late in life, once complete hearing loss was "turned on", then wonderful introspective quality was "turned on". This is absolute yes/no language. We can't morph that into a Volume Dial claim like, "the more he lost his hearing, the more introspective his music became".

  5. Correct61% picked this

    Had he not lost his hearing, Beethoven's later music would probably have been different

    Why this is right

    We can definitely support the Flip the Causal Difference-Maker idea of, "Had he not lost his hearing, B's later music would have had less of an introspective quality than it has." After all, the passage identifies complete hearing loss as a Causal Difference-Maker that made the music have an introspective quality that B's earlier music did not have. Take away complete hearing loss and you likely take away wonderfully introspective quality. If his later music wouldn't have had that wonderfully introspective quality, then it "would have been different than it is".

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free