Reading Comprehension

PT128 · S1 · P3 · Q17 Cultural Identity Influences

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

As the twentieth century draws to a close, we are learning to see the extent to which accounts and definitions of cultures are influenced by human biases and purposes, benevolent in what they include, incorporate, and validate, less so in what they exclude and demote.

Topic

How present-day biases shape national/cultural identities — and how "tradition" gets manufactured to legitimize power.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy. The author surveys recent scholarship that exposes how cultural identities are constructed for present purposes — by both imperial and decolonizing powers — and ends by reaffirming that cultures are mixed and porous despite nationalist claims.

Main Point

National and cultural identities are not neutral facts; they are constructed by present anxieties and agendas. Imperial powers manufacture "tradition" to legitimize themselves; native cultures construct idealized precolonial pasts during decolonization. Yet, despite nationalist insistence on uniqueness, cultures are actually porous and full of "foreign" elements.

P1: Recent scholarship — biases shape cultural identities

Recent studies show present anxieties influence how we construct national identities from the cultural past. Example: Greek civilization was originally known to have African and Eastern roots, but its identity was revised in the nineteenth century to fit European cultural dominance — its African and other influences purged or hidden.

P2: "Tradition" manufactured to legitimize imperial authority

Another example: in the nineteenth century, "tradition" was manufactured and reinterpreted to support European authority over other cultures. As old institutions weakened and pressures mounted, ruling elites projected their power backward in time. In 1876, Queen Victoria was declared empress of India and celebrated in "traditional" jamborees, as if her rule were age-old custom rather than recent edict.

P3: Native cultures do it too

Similar constructions happen in native cultures during decolonization (Algerian war of independence from France: idealized images of pre-French culture). Revolutionary poets do this in independence movements elsewhere — giving adherents something to revive and admire.

17.

The author's use of the word "traditional" (last sentence of the second paragraph) is intended to indicate that the jamborees

  1. had been revived after centuries

    Wrong View

    Making it seem like these are revived after centuries of neglect would suggest that they are legitimately age-old custom, but the context is telling us that these are not actually traditional; they are matter of recent edict.

    4% picked this

  2. were legitimized by their historic

    Wrong View

    The author's point is the opposite. These weren't actually historically used in the Indian culture. They were just designed to seem that way.

    12% picked this

  3. exemplified the dominance of the

    Wrong Emphasis

    While it's true the jamborees are happening because of the dominance of the imperial culture, the word "traditional" isn't trying to indicate dominance. If anything it relates more to the insecurity, than the dominance, of imperial power. The imperial power wants to be liked by the natives, so they are pretending to have a traditional ceremony, so they don't seem like domineering outsiders as much as a paternal presence that's always been there. The word traditional, in quotes, is there to make a specific point that the imperialists were doing something fake, and this answer doesn't get at that at all.

    14% picked this

  4. Correct

    conferred spurious historical legitimacy upon

    Why this is right

    Spurious means "not being what it purports to be; false, fake, or inauthentic". Is the author trying to say that the jamborees gave fake legitimacy to the colonial authorities? Yes! The use of quotes is sarcastic, indicating that these jamborees were not truly traditional. And the prior sentence explains that ruling elites were trying to project their power backward in time to give it a legitimacy that "only longevity could impart". If you're faking something in order to gain legitimacy, then it's fair to say you received fake legitimacy by doing it.

    Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    62% picked this

  5. combined historic elements of imperial

    Wrong View

    The passage doesn't treat these jamborees as a combination of imperial and native cultural elements. It's not really clear whether these ceremonies were ripping off a traditional Indian custom and inserting Queen Victoria into it, or whether they were taking a British custom and making it seem like a traditional Indian thing. But in either case, it's not presented as a mix of cultural histories. And in either case, the word "traditional" is saying that even though Queen V's rule was a matter of recent decree, they wanted to make it seem like a matter of age-old custom. This answer has nothing to do with that messaging.

    9% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free