Reading Comprehension

PT128 · S1 · P2 · Q13 Bankruptcy Law

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In many Western societies, modern bankruptcy laws have undergone a shift away from a focus on punishment and toward a focus on bankruptcy as a remedy for individuals and corporations in financial trouble—and, perhaps unexpectedly, for their creditors.

Topic

Modern bankruptcy laws: shift from punishment to economic remedy

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

Modern bankruptcy laws have moved away from punishing debtors to instead prioritizing continued economic activity and coordinated debt resolution, which ultimately benefits both debtors and creditors—making a return to punitive approaches misguided. The Most Valuable Sentence: The main point is most clearly spelled out at the end of the first paragraph:

P1: Introduction / Framing the Shift

Modern bankruptcy laws in Western societies are no longer about punishing people who can't pay their debts. Instead, bankruptcy is now seen as a solution, not just for debtors, but for creditors too. People have criticized how common bankruptcy filings have become, but tightening up the laws could actually hurt the economy by preventing people and companies from continuing to participate in it. So, the author argues against going back to more punitive (punishing) laws.

P2: The Punitive Old System

In the past, people with too much debt could be thrown in prison or have their businesses terminated, based on the idea that they were irresponsible or purposely failing to pay. This was seen as necessary to protect society from "bad actors." But jailing debtors doesn’t help creditors get their money back, and shutting down big companies can harm many people by causing unemployment and disrupting vital services.

P3: Foundations and Mechanics of the New System

Modern bankruptcy laws are built on two beliefs: (1) the public good should come first, and (2) the economy works better when indebted people and companies can still function, rather than being shut down. Typically, the courts help reorganize debts, resulting in partial relief for debtors and some payments for creditors. There are still punitive aspects, like damaged credit records, but the main goal now is to keep people and businesses economically productive, hoping to restore them to health and maximize creditors’ eventual repayment.

13.

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the author's argument against harsh punishment for debtors?

  1. Extensive study of the economic

    Too Weak

    The issue is not personal economic responsibility but rather overall economic prosperity for the society. This answer fails to consider the creditors and employees and the overall economic cost of punitive bankruptcy laws.

    21% picked this

  2. The bankruptcy of a certain

    Strengthens

    This supports the author’s point that punitive bankruptcy laws are less beneficial to the economic position of a society than modern bankruptcy laws.

    6% picked this

  3. Once imprisonment was no longer

    Too Weak

    The author’s argument already conceded that the number of bankruptcy filings increased with the arrival of modern bankruptcy laws.

    4% picked this

  4. The court-ordered liquidation of a

    Weaker/Mixed Impact

    This sounds like the punitive model did some of the stuff the author was worried about (like throwing hundreds of people out of work), while also doing something the author wouldn't expect out of the punitive model (robust growth in the local economy in the immediate aftermath). On one hand, it's an inferior answer to (E) because it has mixed impact (part of it strengthens the author's case, in saying that the punitive model puts people out of work). But it's also inferior because the weakening part is far weaker in impact than (E)'s weakening part. Here we get local economic growth in the immediate aftermath. That's limited in scope and duration. With (E), we get greater economic health overall for the whole country (which sounds more like the "public good" that the author thinks is paramount).

    11% picked this

  5. Correct

    Countries that continue to imprison

    Why this is right

    The author makes an economic argument against punitive bankruptcy laws (first and third paragraph). She favors modern laws because they're better for the economy overall. But this answer heavily undercuts that assumption. It's saying that the punitive model is correlated with overall economic health.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    59% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free