Reading Comprehension

PT127 · S4 · P4 · Q27 French Egalitarian Education Reforms

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

During most of the nineteenth century, many French women continued to be educated according to models long established by custom and religious tradition.

Central Topic / Purpose

The failure of the French Revolution to institute meaningful educational reform for women / to defend against criticism

Main Point

Even though reforms weren't enacted at the end of the Revolution, two progressive reforms were proposed, and those ultimately were valuable in the eventual reforms that came nearly 100 years later.

Passage Map

P1: Opposing point of view (French Revolution's failure to get real educational reform was a missed opportunity) + Author's Thesis P2: Summary of the two proposed reforms P3: Author's assessment of why they failed to be enacted but what ultimate value they still provided

Other Commentary

The first paragraph has a classic opening paragraph structure: Background / Opposing Point / Author's Pivot. And the last sentence of the first paragraph is pretty much the thesis (most common place to find it). However, we would also want to include the author's takeaways in the 3rd paragraph, that although these reforms couldn't initially break through the strong cultural headwinds, they laid down a precedent that was critical to eventually moving forward a century later.

27.

The author would most likely describe the proposals mentioned in the passage with which one of the following statements?

  1. They espoused reforms that were

    Opposite

    Beginning of the 3rd paragraph would go against this. He thinks there were "immense cultural and political obstacles to egalitarianism at the time".

    5% picked this

  2. They were fundamentally unethical due

    Too Negative: "fundamentally unethical"

    Our author seems unimpressed with certain traditional ideas retained in the proposals, but overall she's presenting them as though they were an honorable attempt at a step forward.

    8% picked this

  3. Correct

    They were well-meaning attempts to

    Why this is right

    This captures the overall positivity ("they tried to make things better, but they were up against strong forces, and even the attempt was useful when it came to passing the eventual reform") as well as the tinge of resigned realism (they did both continue to define women in terms of domestic roles).

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    80% picked this

  4. They were reasonable, and it

    Opposite

    The beginning of the 3rd paragraph shows that the author is not surprised that they initially failed, so she finds their failure understandable.

    1% picked this

  5. They were not adopted because

    Opposite

    She thinks they weren't adapted because they were too radical for their time, not because they weren't radical enough (as this answer choice implies).

    6% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free