Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT127 S4 P2 Q14 Explanation

Inclusive Fitness Theory

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Mechanisms for recognizing kin are found throughout the plant and animal kingdoms, regardless of an organism's social or mental complexity. Improvements in the general understanding of these mechanisms have turned some biologists' attention to the question of why kin recognition occurs at all. One response to this question is offered by the the honeybee, most of whose members do not produce offspring and exist only to nurture relatives.

Inclusive fitness theory has also been applied usefully to new findings concerning cannibalism within animal species. Based on the theory, cannibals should have evolved to avoid eating their own kin because of the obvious genetic costs of such a practice. Spadefoot toad tadpoles provide an illustration. Biologists have found that all tadpoles when it becomes very hungry, apparently putting its own unique genetic makeup ahead of its siblings'.

But there may be other reasons why organisms recognize kin. For example, it has recently been found that tiger salamander larvae, also either omnivorous or cannibalistic, are plagued in nature by a deadly bacterium. Furthermore, it was determined that cannibal larvae are especially likely to be infected by eating diseased species members. which an organism preserves its own life, not as a means to aid in relatives' survival.

What this question is testing

Inference

Your task

Find what must be true based on what the passage or stimulus states.

Common trap

Answers that are plausible or likely but not actually guaranteed by the text.

Winning move

Keep only the choice the statements fully support — eliminate anything that requires an extra assumption.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

The information in the passage most strongly suggests that the fact that most honeybees exist only

Answer choices

  1. Unknown vs. Unexplained8% picked this

    was not known to be true before

    The passage wasn't saying that the existence of honeybees and their patterns of largely supporting the replication of a small subset of their society was unknown before the 1960s. We just couldn't explain it with our traditional view of evolution, but then inclusive fitness theory came in the 1960s and gave us a way to explain it.

  2. Too Strong: only if6% picked this

    can be explained only if we assume that these members are in turn nurtured by

    This is an unsupported strong idea, and it also runs counter to why we're talking about honeybees. The author isn't speculating some explanation like, "Maybe it's a you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours type of arrangement". She's saying, "We now have an explanation for why it's evolutionarily sound to just help your relatives replicate: inclusive fitness theory."

  3. Too Strong: most2% picked this

    is what led most biologists to reject the traditional view

    We don't have any information about why most biologists rejected the traditional view. The honeybee species was something not well explained by the traditional view but better explained by the inclusive fitness theory. So once inclusive fitness theory came around, some biologists no doubt thought, "Hey, that would actually explain that honeybee mystery!" But we have no evidence that honeybees specifically are the reason why more than 50% of biologists rejected the traditional view.

  4. Out of Scope: calls into question14% picked this

    calls into question the view that evolution proceeds by

    The author isn't undermining the idea of natural selection. Inclusive fitness theory expands the range of things that natural selection favors. It doesn't undermine the overall concept of natural selection.

  5. Correct71% picked this

    is difficult to explain without at least supplementing the traditional view of evolution with

    Why this is right

    This is just a complicated way of saying, "the traditional view wasn't able to explain the honeybee species." Thus, it would be difficult to explain the honeybee species if you were exclusively using the traditional view. We don't necessarily have to throw out the traditional view, but it will be hard to explain honeybees, unless we supplement the traditional view with some other hypothesis, such as the inclusive fitness theory, which does provide a framework for understanding the honeybee.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free