Reading Comprehension

PT127 · S4 · P2 · Q14 Inclusive Fitness Theory

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Mechanisms for recognizing kin are found throughout the plant and animal kingdoms, regardless of an organism's social or mental complexity.

Topic

Why kin recognition exists among animals and how it can be explained by different evolutionary theories.

Framework

Answer / Explain

Main Point

Scientists have several explanations for why animals recognize their kin: inclusive fitness theory proposes it’s to protect their own genetic legacy by helping relatives, but in some cases (like with tiger salamanders), avoiding kin may purely be for self-preservation to reduce risk of disease. *The Most Valuable Sentence is probably the last sentence of P2: and the last sentence of P3: *

P1: Introduction to Inclusive Fitness Theory

All kinds of organisms can recognize their kin, and one important theory (inclusive fitness) says this happens so creatures can increase the survival of their own genes—not just through offspring, but through relatives, too. This theory helps explain behaviors that don’t seem to benefit an individual directly, like sterile worker bees helping their family.

P2: Applying Inclusive Fitness Theory to Cannibalism

This theory is supported by studies of cannibal tadpoles: they usually avoid eating their relatives, which makes sense if they’re trying to protect their own genetic legacy. Occasionally, ultra-hungry tadpoles will eat siblings anyway—implying that self-preservation can sometimes override this behavior.

P3: Alternative Explanation—Disease Avoidance

But inclusive fitness isn’t the only answer! For tiger salamander cannibals, avoiding kin may actually just be about not catching deadly diseases, since they’re more likely to get sick from eating relatives. For them, kin recognition may not be about helping family, just avoiding illness and preserving their own life.

14.

The information in the passage most strongly suggests that the fact that most honeybees exist only to nurture relatives

  1. was not known to be

    Unknown vs. Unexplained

    The passage wasn't saying that the existence of honeybees and their patterns of largely supporting the replication of a small subset of their society was unknown before the 1960s. We just couldn't explain it with our traditional view of evolution, but then inclusive fitness theory came in the 1960s and gave us a way to explain it.

    8% picked this

  2. can be explained only if

    Too Strong: only if

    This is an unsupported strong idea, and it also runs counter to why we're talking about honeybees. The author isn't speculating some explanation like, "Maybe it's a you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours type of arrangement". She's saying, "We now have an explanation for why it's evolutionarily sound to just help your relatives replicate: inclusive fitness theory."

    6% picked this

  3. is what led most biologists

    Too Strong: most

    We don't have any information about why most biologists rejected the traditional view. The honeybee species was something not well explained by the traditional view but better explained by the inclusive fitness theory. So once inclusive fitness theory came around, some biologists no doubt thought, "Hey, that would actually explain that honeybee mystery!" But we have no evidence that honeybees specifically are the reason why more than 50% of biologists rejected the traditional view.

    1% picked this

  4. calls into question the view

    Out of Scope: calls into question

    The author isn't undermining the idea of natural selection. Inclusive fitness theory expands the range of things that natural selection favors. It doesn't undermine the overall concept of natural selection.

    14% picked this

  5. Correct

    is difficult to explain without

    Why this is right

    This is just a complicated way of saying, "the traditional view wasn't able to explain the honeybee species." Thus, it would be difficult to explain the honeybee species if you were exclusively using the traditional view. We don't necessarily have to throw out the traditional view, but it will be hard to explain honeybees, unless we supplement the traditional view with some other hypothesis, such as the inclusive fitness theory, which does provide a framework for understanding the honeybee.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    71% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free