Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT127 S4 P2 Q13 Explanation

Inclusive Fitness Theory

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocate DetailScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Mechanisms for recognizing kin are found throughout the plant and animal kingdoms, regardless of an organism's social or mental complexity. Improvements in the general understanding of these mechanisms have turned some biologists' attention to the question of why kin recognition occurs at all. One response to this question is offered by the the honeybee, most of whose members do not produce offspring and exist only to nurture relatives.

Inclusive fitness theory has also been applied usefully to new findings concerning cannibalism within animal species. Based on the theory, cannibals should have evolved to avoid eating their own kin because of the obvious genetic costs of such a practice. Spadefoot toad tadpoles provide an illustration. Biologists have found that all tadpoles when it becomes very hungry, apparently putting its own unique genetic makeup ahead of its siblings'.

But there may be other reasons why organisms recognize kin. For example, it has recently been found that tiger salamander larvae, also either omnivorous or cannibalistic, are plagued in nature by a deadly bacterium. Furthermore, it was determined that cannibal larvae are especially likely to be infected by eating diseased species members. which an organism preserves its own life, not as a means to aid in relatives' survival.

What this question is testing

Locate Detail

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

The passage states which one of the following about the mechanisms that enable organisms to recognize their

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong6% picked this

    The mechanisms are most easily explained if we assume that they have a similar purpose in all species regardless of the

    Too Strong: most easily Too Strong: similar in all This is definitely repeating words from our Support Window (like social or mental complexity), but it's saying something strong that has no support. We were never told what the #1 most easy way to explain these kin mechanisms is, nor did the passage ever talk about assuming they have a similar purpose in all species.

  2. Correct56% picked this

    The mechanisms have become more clearly understood, prompting interest in the

    Why this is right

    This was stated in the 2nd sentence of the passage (and our Support Window). Improvements in the general understanding of these mechanisms (the mechanisms have become more clearly understood) have turned some biologists' attention to (prompting interesting in) the question of why kin recognition occurs at all (the purpose they serve)

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Strong: only since2% picked this

    The mechanisms have become the focus of theoretical attention only since

    We don't have any strong wording in which they stated that it wasn't until the 1960s that these mechanisms because the focus of any theoretical attention.

  4. Too Strong: must Contradicted, if anything8% picked this

    The detailed workings of these mechanisms must be better understood before their purpose can

    In the second sentence, it sounds like biologists are already prepared to start trying to fully explain the purpose of kin mechanisms. They've turned their attention to answering that question about purpose. That sounds like the opposite of, "We can't study their purpose yet. We need to wait until the detailed workings are better understood."

  5. Too Strong: exactly the same function28% picked this

    The mechanisms operate differently in different species even when they serve exactly

    This doesn't resemble anything in our Support Window. I can see someone being tempted by this because we learned that spadefoot tadpoles have kin recognition so that they can avoid eating their relatives (ya know, unless they're famished), whereas tiger salamanders use kin recognition to avoid eating a relative that might pass on a deadly disease to them. Is that serving exactly the same function? No, those were two different functions 1. i'd rather eat non-relatives, so the shared genes of my relatives can prosper 2. I'd rather eat non-relatives, because if I eat a relative who's infected with that bacterium, then I'm going to feel it extra hard

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free