Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT127 S3 Q22 Explanation

On the basis of relatively

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be False

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

On the basis of relatively minor morphological differences, some scientists suggest that Neanderthals should be considered a species distinct from Cro-Magnons, the forerunners of modern humans. Yet the fact that the tools used by these two groups of hominids living in different environments were of exactly the same type indicates uncanny behavioral species, and that the morphological differences are due merely to their having lived in different environments.

What this question is testing

Must be False

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
22.

If the statements above are true, then each of the following could

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: "guarantee"6% picked this

    Morphological differences between the members of two populations do not guarantee that the two populations do not belong

    In order to contradict this, the passage would have needed to say that morphological differences guarantee that the two populations are two different species. We can't find support for that strong an idea.

  2. Correct60% picked this

    The daily challenges with which an environment confronts its inhabitants are unique

    Why this is right

    We inferred from the conditional rule that Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons faced the same daily challenges (despite living in different environments). This answer contradicts that idea, saying that if you live in different environments, it's impossible to have the same daily challenges (each set of daily challenges is unique).

    Skill tested: Must be False · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Unsupported Comparison15% picked this

    There are greater morphological differences between Cro-Magnons and modern humans than there are between

    Unsupported Comparison: "Neanderthal's vs. Humans / CroMagnon's vs. humans" We weren't given any information allowing us to compare Neanderthals or Cro-Magnons to humans, so we can't speak to which group would have more morphological differences.

  4. Out of Scope15% picked this

    Use of similar tools is required if members of two distinct groups of tool-making hominids are to be considered

    Out of Scope: "same species, different tools" In order to contradict the idea that "X is required if Y is to be true", you'd need an example where Y was true, even though X was not. So in order for us to be able to contradict this answer, we would need to have an example where two groups of hominids were members of the same species, but they did not use similar tools. The stimulus only talks about two groups who did use similar tools, so we can't contradict this.

  5. Out of Scope Comparison4% picked this

    Through much of their coexistence, Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals were geographically isolated

    Out of Scope Comparison: "isolated vs. not isolated" This seems pretty compatible with the passage, since we know that these two groups lived in different environments. Maybe they were isolated, maybe not. We don't have a way to contradict it and show that the two groups definitely had geographic connections.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free