Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT127 S3 Q14 Explanation

Many movies starring top

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParallel Flaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Many movies starring top actors will do well at the box office because the actors are already well known and have a loyal following. Movies unlikely to do well.

What this question is testing

Parallel Flaw

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

The flawed reasoning in the argument above is most similar to that in which one

Answer choices

  1. Weak Premise Match / Bad Conclusion Match3% picked this

    Many animals must devote most of their energy to locating food, or they will not get enough food to maintain optimal energy levels. Thus,

    The premise doesn't give us a great "things of type X', because type X would be "animals". With this first sentence, the correct conclusion would have said, "Thus, non-animal forms of life are unlikely to devote most of their energy to locating food."

  2. Correct87% picked this

    Often the presence of the flower bee balm in a garden will attract bumblebees that pollinate the plants and enable the garden to produce

    Why this is right

    Gardens that have flower bee balm have abundant crops. Thus, gardens that lack bee balm are unlikely to have abundant crops.

    Skill tested: Parallel Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Bad Conclusion Match1% picked this

    A person's ability to keep confidences is a large part of being a friend, since frequently such an ability enables a high degree of

    If we're told in the premise that "people who can keep confidences .... are X", then a matching conclusion would need to say "people who cannot keep confidences are unlikely to be X", and this conclusion is nowhere near that.

  4. Bad Conclusion Match7% picked this

    Visual aids can be very useful in effectively teaching math skills, because they generally allow vivid conceptualization of math principles. If such visual aids

    This is somewhat close. The author goes from "Teaching with visual aids can be effective" to a conclusion that kind of feels like "Teaching without visual aids is unlikely to be effective". But the strength of the conclusion is off: sometimes not trait A vs. unlikely to be trait A. Also, the formulation of "Thus, if visual aids were never employed" would mean that the original argument's conclusion had read, "Thus, if there were no such thing as movies with famous actors ..."

  5. Bad Premise Match / Bad Conclusion Match2% picked this

    An understanding of the rules of perspective is necessary for achieving success as a painter, since it is the understanding of these most basic

    The premise is giving us a rule that "X is necessary to Y". That's nothing like the original premise: "Many things of type X have trait A". We could stop reading there, but the conclusion is also mismatching because it doesn't flip from painters who do understand the rules to painters who don't understand the rules.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free