With their recognition of Maxine Hong Kingston as a major literary figure, some critics have suggested that her works have been produced almost ex nihilo, saying that they lack a large traceable body of direct literary antecedents especially within the Chinese American heritage in which her work is embedded. But these critics, a highly developed genre of song and spoken narrative known as "talk-story" (gong gu tsai).
Traditionally performed in the dialects of various ethnic enclaves, talk-story has been maintained within the confines of the family and has rarely surfaced into print. The tradition dates back to Sung dynasty (A.D. 970-1279) storytellers in China, and in the United States it is continually revitalized by an overlapping sequence of immigration or new forms of Western discourse, as in the case of Kingston's adaptations written in English.
Kingston herself believes that as a literary artist she is one in a long line of performers shaping a recalcitrant history into talk-story form. She distinguishes her "thematic" storytelling memory processes, which sift and reconstruct the essential elements of “personally remembered stories”, from the memory processes of a print-oriented culture that emphasizes be frozen in print, but which continue to grow both around and from that frozen text.
Kingston's participation in the tradition of talk-story is evidenced in her book China Men, which utilizes forms typical of that genre and common to most oral cultures including: a fixed "grammar" of repetitive themes; a spectrum of stock characters; symmetrical structures, including balanced oppositions (verbal or physical contests, antithetical characters, dialectical discourse language rich in aural and visual puns, making her work a written form of talk-story.
What this question is testing
Anticipate
This is a Most Strongly Supported question. The trick is to find an answer that the passage clearly backs without going further than the passage does. Strong candidates here come from the contrast the passage explicitly draws: talk-story uses thematic, reconstructive memory, while print culture emphasizes exact word retention.
Goal
Looking for an answer the passage will essentially restate. Common traps:
Answers that exaggerate (frequency claims, "most" claims) when the passage isn't comparing
Answers that introduce a topic the passage never addresses
Answers that flip a claim from positive to qualified or vice versa
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.