Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT126 S1 Q14 Explanation

Eighteenth-century moralist: You should

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsFlaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Eighteenth-century moralist: You should never make an effort to acquire expensive new tastes, since they are a drain on your purse and in the course of acquiring them you may expose yourself to sensations that are obnoxious to you. expended in their acquisition attests their superfluity.

What this question is testing

Flaw

Your task

Describe the reasoning error the argument actually commits.

Common trap

Answers that name a real logical flaw the argument doesn't actually make.

Winning move

Articulate the gap in the reasoning yourself, then match it to the choice that describes that gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

The moralist's reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that

Answer choices

  1. Wrong Flaw9% picked this

    draws a conclusion that simply restates a claim presented in support

    This describes a circular argument, but the conclusion does not simply restate a premise.

  2. Too Strong6% picked this

    takes for granted that the acquisition of expensive tastes will lead

    This describes a possible further drawback of acquiring expensive new tastes, but one that the argument does not assume.

  3. Wrong Flaw1% picked this

    uses the inherently vague term "sensations" without providing a definition of

    The term “sensations” is stated only once in the argument. For this answer to correctly describe the flaw, the term “sensations” would need to be used more than once and with more than one meaning in those uses.

  4. Wrong Flaw10% picked this

    mistakes a cause of acquisition of expensive tastes for an effect of acquisition

    The argument does not mistakenly reverse a causal relationship.

  5. Correct74% picked this

    rejects trying to achieve a goal because of the cost of achieving it, without considering the

    Why this is right

    This correctly points out that the argument only considers the drawbacks associated with acquiring expensive new tastes without considering any of the advantages of doing so.

    Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free