Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT126 S1 Q13 Explanation

People aged 46 to 55

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

People aged 46 to 55 spend more money per capita than people of any other age group. So it is puzzling that when companies advertise consumer products on television, they focus almost exclusively on people aged 25 and under. Indeed, those who make decisions about television advertising think that the value of and under who can be expected to be watching at that time.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the puzzling

Answer choices

  1. Deepens the Paradox16% picked this

    The expense of television advertising slots makes it crucial for companies to target people who are most likely

    According to the puzzling facts, the ones who spend the money and might be therefore most likely to purchase their products would be those aged 46 to 55.

  2. Too Weak2% picked this

    Advertising slots during news programs almost always cost far less than advertising slots during popular sitcoms whose leading

    This might reflect an assumption that a smaller percentage of those who watch news programs are 25 and under. But it does not explain why this pattern exists.

  3. Too Weak8% picked this

    When television executives decide which shows to renew, they do so primarily in terms of the shows' ratings among

    That people aged 25 and under are the primary consideration for deciding which shows to renew does not mean they are the only consideration. And yet, companies believe that the value depends entirely on those aged 25 and under.

  4. Correct70% picked this

    Those who make decisions about television advertising believe that people older than 25 almost never

    Why this is right

    This would explain why the only value lies in reaching those 25 and under. If people’s behavior cannot be changed there’s no point in spending money trying to do it.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Out of Scope3% picked this

    When companies advertise consumer products in print media, they focus primarily on people aged

    Print media is not relevant to the puzzling facts.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free