Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT125 S4 Q7 Explanation

In an experiment, biologists

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsNecessary Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

In an experiment, biologists repeatedly shone a bright light into a tank containing a sea snail and simultaneously shook the tank. The snail invariably responded by tensing its muscular "foot," a typical reaction in sea snails to ocean turbulence. After several repetitions of this procedure, the snail tensed its "foot" whenever the associate the shining of the bright light with the shaking of the tank.

What this question is testing

Necessary Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.

Common trap

Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).

Winning move

Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
7.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong1% picked this

    All sea snails react to ocean turbulence in the same way as the sea snail

    The argument suggests that the reaction of the sea snail is typical, but it need not be the case that all sea snails would react the same way.

  2. Out of Scope6% picked this

    Sea snails are not ordinarily exposed to bright lights such as the one used in

    Whether the experience is common or rare is irrelevant. The question is whether the sea snail would normally respond to the bright light by tensing its "foot."

  3. Out of Scope - Opposite Group3% picked this

    The sea snail used in the experiment did not differ significantly from other members of its species in

    Other sea snails are not relevant to this argument about one specific sea snail.

  4. Correct85% picked this

    The appearance of a bright light alone would ordinarily not result in the sea snail's

    Why this is right

    This answer rules out a possible alternative explanation for the sea snail's reaction. In order to infer one explanation of the observed tense “foot” the argument must assume that something else does not explain it.

    Skill tested: Necessary Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Out of Scope5% picked this

    Tensing of the muscular "foot" in sea snails is an instinctual rather than a learned

    The argument is about whether the sea snail demonstrated a learned response to shining a bright light, not about whether tensing of the "foot" in response to ocean turbulence is learned or instinctual.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free