Expert: A group of researchers

Answer choices

1. A

   Not a Flaw1% picked this

   fails to provide a definition of the technical

   The argument does not need to provide a definition of the technical term “fractal.”

   1%
2. B

   Wrong Flaw9% picked this

   contradicts itself by denying in its conclusion the claim of scientific authorities that it relies

   The argument does not contradict itself, but rather attempts to contradict the researchers’ claim.

   9%
3. C

   Wrong Flaw8% picked this

   concludes that a claim is false merely on the grounds that there is insufficient evidence

   The evidence attempts to rebut the researchers’ claim and goes beyond suggesting that the researchers have failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove their claim.

   8%
4. D

   Correct72% picked this

   interprets an assertion that certain conditions are necessary as asserting that those

   Why this is right

   This correctly describes the reversed logic of the expert.

   Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

   72%
5. E

   Too Strong11% picked this

   takes for granted that there are only two possible alternatives, either below or

   The argument does not assume that there are only two possible alternatives since the argument permits the possibility that the antenna works at 250 megahertz.

   11%