Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT125 S4 Q1 Explanation

Editorialist: Advertisers devote millions

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Editorialist: Advertisers devote millions of dollars to the attempt to instill attitudes and desires that lead people to purchase particular products, and advertisers' techniques have been adopted by political strategists in democratic countries, who are paid to manipulate public opinion in every political campaign. Thus, the viewed as representing the unadulterated preferences of the people.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
1.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the

Answer choices

  1. Weakens2% picked this

    Public opinion can be manipulated more easily by officials of nondemocratic governments than by those

    This makes it less likely that the political advertisements in the conclusion of the argument actually affected change in voters’ beliefs.

  2. Too Weak5% picked this

    Advertisers' techniques are often apparent to the people to whom the

    That people can recognize the advertisers’ techniques does not preclude them from being effective.

  3. Too Weak3% picked this

    Many democratic countries have laws limiting the amount that may be spent on political advertisements

    This reduces the amount of political advertising but not preclude them from being effective.

  4. Too Weak / Irrelevant Comparison2% picked this

    People who neither watch television nor read any print media are more likely to vote than people who do one

    There are two issues with this answer. First, there are other forms of media that could serve as the medium for political advertisements. And second, the argument is about the preferences of the people, not the segment of the population that votes.

  5. Correct89% picked this

    Unlike advertisements for consumer products, most of which only reinforce existing beliefs, political advertisements often

    Why this is right

    This suggests that the political advertisements are actually effectual and that they change voters’ beliefs.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free