A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.
Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests
If somebody were going to open a store there, they would already have started publicizing it.
But there has been no such publicity.
Contrary to recent speculations, no hardware store will be opening in the shopping plaza
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion drawn in the argument?
Some people have surmised that
This is the point the argument opposes.
1% picked this
A hardware store will not
Why this is right
This best paraphrases the argument's main point.
Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.
88% picked this
If somebody were going to
This is evidence that supports the argument's
7% picked this
It would be unwise to
The argument does not discuss whether it would be wise to open a hardware store in the shopping plaza
0% picked this
There has been no publicity
This is evidence that supports the argument's main point.
4% picked this
Continue the review in LSAT Lab
Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.
Turn this review into a targeted study plan.
Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.