Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT124 S3 Q23 Explanation

Naturalist: A species can survive

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParallel

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Naturalist: A species can survive a change in environment, as long as the change is not too rapid. Therefore, the threats we are creating to woodland species arise not from the fact that we are cutting rate at which we are doing so.

What this question is testing

Parallel

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

The reasoning in which one of the following is most similar to that in

Answer choices

  1. Wrong Conclusion6% picked this

    The problem with burning fossil fuels is that the supply is limited; so, the faster we expend these resources, the sooner we will

    The conclusion in this answer does not challenge one possible cause and offer an alternative cause, as in the stimulus.

  2. Wrong Conclusion2% picked this

    Many people gain more satisfaction from performing a job well—regardless of whether they like the job—than from doing merely adequately a job they like;

    This argument does not challenge a possible cause of happiness before asserting that performing a job well is the cause of happiness.

  3. Wrong Premise16% picked this

    Some students who study thoroughly do well in school. Thus, what is most important for success in school is not how much time a

    This argument provides an example that supports the asserted cause, but for this answer to be correct the premise should challenge whether the amount of time a student puts into studying could be the more important contributor to success.

  4. Correct74% picked this

    People do not fear change if they know what the change will bring; so, our employees' fear stems not from our company's undergoing change,

    Why this is right

    The argument challenges one cause of the employees' fear by presenting a counter example and proposing an alternative cause.

    Skill tested: Parallel · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Wrong Conclusion3% picked this

    Until ten years ago, we had good soil and our agriculture flourished. Therefore, the recent decline of our agriculture is a result of our

    This conclusion does not match the original argument since it does not rule out a possible cause of the decline in agriculture before asserting that two factors jointly caused the decline.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free