Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT124 S2 Q6 Explanation

Some argue that laws are

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Some argue that laws are instituted at least in part to help establish a particular moral fabric in society. But the primary function of law is surely to help order society so that its institutions, organizations, and citizenry can work together harmoniously, regardless of any further moral aims of the law. Indeed, religious faith as grounds for making exceptions in the application of laws.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

The Setup

The author argues that law's primary job is ordering society — making institutions and people work together — even though others say laws also establish moral fabric. Then the author offers a piece of evidence: highest courts have on occasion treated moral or religious beliefs as grounds for exceptions in applying laws.

Evaluate

That second premise is concrete and supports a careful inference: sometimes the application of laws accounts for the beliefs of the people governed. Not always, not as a rule — just sometimes, when courts grant exceptions.

Goal

Look for a hedged inference. Watch out for answers that go too big — claiming law has no moral aims, that all moral actions are protected, or that society should never be ordered morally.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of

Answer choices

  1. Correct80% picked this

    The manner in which laws are applied sometimes takes into account the beliefs of the people

    Why this is right

    This is a modest inference directly supported by the second premise. The stimulus tells us highest courts have on occasion made exceptions for moral or religious beliefs — that is, the application of law has sometimes taken those beliefs into account. The hedge "sometimes" matches the stimulus's "on occasion." The inference is small enough to be safe and large enough to actually say something.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Too Strong5% picked this

    The law has as one of its functions the ordering of society but is devoid

    The author says law's primary function is ordering society "regardless of any further moral aims of the law." That language allows that there might be further moral aims — just that they are secondary. This answer says law is "devoid of moral aims" — completely free of them. That goes further than the stimulus supports.

  3. Too Strong3% picked this

    Actions based on religious belief or on moral conviction tend to receive the protection of

    The stimulus says actions based on conscience or religious belief have on occasion been treated as grounds for exception — not that such actions tend to receive court protection. "Tend to" implies a general pattern; "on occasion" is occasional. This is a stronger generalization than the evidence supports.

  4. Too Strong5% picked this

    The way a society is ordered by law should not reflect any moral convictions about the way society

    This is a sweeping prescriptive claim — that society's legal ordering should not reflect any moral convictions. The stimulus only argues that ordering, not moral teaching, is law's primary function. It does not insist that legal ordering must be morality-free, just that morality is secondary. This goes too far.

  5. Too Strong6% picked this

    The best way to promote cooperation among a society’s institutions, organizations, and citizenry is to institute order in that

    "The best way" is a sweeping superlative. The stimulus says law's primary function is to order society, which suggests it is one method — but not that it is the best way to promote cooperation. Other methods (culture, education, economic incentives) might be equally good or better. This goes beyond what the stimulus supports.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free