In the city of Glasgow, Scotland, trade doubled between 1750, when the first bank opened there, and 1765, when government regulations on banking were first implemented in Scotland.
Given that ..
The first bank in Glasgow opened in 1750,
Why is it that ...
Trade doubled between then and 1765 (when government regulations were first implemented?
Evaluate
This is a weird stimulus because it's not really a Paradox, as we typically expect when the question stem asks us to explain something.
It's really just, "Explain why trade doubled between 1750 and 1765". The only thing we know is that the first bank opened in 1750, so explanation answers could help us understand how a bank opening would lead to twice as much trade.
But the explanation for the doubling of trade doesn't need to be due to the first bank opening. We could also just hear about something else that changed near 1750 that could cause an increase in trade.
The government regulations part in 1765 doesn't seem relevant to anything. We're only trying to explain the doubling, which takes place between 1750 and 1765. We don't care what happens to Glasgow from 1765-onward.
The only way the 1765 regulations could be relevant would be if people knew in the 1750-1765 period that these regulations were coming and that caused their trading behavior to increase.
Goal
Get rid of four answers that can give us a potential storyline for why trade doubled between 1750 and 1765 in Glasgow.