Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT124 S1 Q25 Explanation

Occultist: The issue of whether astrology

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsFlaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Occultist: The issue of whether astrology is a science is easily settled: it is both an art and a science. The scientific components are the complicated mathematics and the astronomical knowledge needed to create an astrological chart. The art is in the synthesis of coherent statement of their relevance to an individual.

What this question is testing

Flaw

Your task

Describe the reasoning error the argument actually commits.

Common trap

Answers that name a real logical flaw the argument doesn't actually make.

Winning move

Articulate the gap in the reasoning yourself, then match it to the choice that describes that gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
25.

The reasoning in the occultist's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds

Answer choices

  1. Reversed Logic3% picked this

    presumes, without providing justification, that any science must involve

    The argument presumes that because astrology involves complicated mathematics that it is a science, but not the other way around.

  2. Correct72% picked this

    incorrectly infers that a practice is a science merely from the fact that the practice

    Why this is right

    This points out that merely having scientific components does not make astrology a science.

    Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Contradiction9% picked this

    denies the possibility that astrology involves components that are neither artistic

    The argument does not deny this possibility.

  4. Unsupported Relationship13% picked this

    incorrectly infers that astronomical knowledge is scientific merely from the fact that such knowledge is needed to

    The argument does say that astronomical knowledge is scientific, but does not base that assertion on the fact that astronomical knowledge is needed to create an astrological chart.

  5. Reversed Logic4% picked this

    presumes, without providing justification, that any art must involve the synthesis of a multitude of

    The argument does assume that synthesizing a multitude of factors and symbols makes something an art, but it does not assume that all arts must do so.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free