Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT124 S1 Q2 Explanation

Elaine: The purpose of art

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsAgree/Disagree

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Elaine: The purpose of art museums is to preserve artworks and make them available to the public. Museums, therefore, should seek to acquire and display the best examples of artworks from each artistic period and genre, are not recognized by experts as masterpieces.

Frederick: Art museums ought to devote their limited resources to acquiring the works of recognized masters in order to the greatest artworks.

What this question is testing

Agree/Disagree

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
2.

Elaine's and Frederick's statements provide the most support for the claim that they would

Answer choices

  1. Out Of Scope11% picked this

    many artistic masterpieces are not recognized as such by

    Out Of Scope: “masterpieces not recognized as masterpieces” Neither person says anything about pieces of art that rightly should be considered masterpieces but haven’t been by experts.

  2. Correct72% picked this

    museums should seek to represent all genres of art in

    Why this is right

    Elaine says yes to this, while Fred says, “No, they have limited resources and instead should seek to maximize their number of masterpieces”.

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Agree3% picked this

    art museums should seek to preserve works

    They would agree on this claim. They both think that museums should be preserving certain types of work.

  4. Trap6% picked this

    an art museum ought to acquire an unusual example of a period or genre if more characteristic

    Both Disagree Out Of Scope: “prohibitively expensive” Neither person discusses such a specific hypothetical. Since Elaine wants the best examples, not necessarily an unusual example, she would probably disagree. And Fred would disagree because he wants museums to pursue masterpieces.

  5. Too Strong: “all”7% picked this

    all of the artworks that experts identify as masterpieces are

    We wouldn’t be able to infer that either person agrees to this incredibly strong claim. Also, neither person is talking about this issue that A and E mention, of whether there are works that are masterpieces but aren’t recognized as such, or works that are recognized as such but aren’t masterpieces.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free