Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT123 S2 Q14 Explanation

A cup of raw milk after being heated

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

A cup of raw milk, after being heated in a microwave oven to 50 degrees Celsius, contains half its initial concentration of a particular enzyme, lysozyme. If, however, the milk reaches that temperature through exposure to a conventional heat source of 50 degrees Celsius, it will contain nearly all of the enzyme is not heat but microwaves, which generate heat.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens

Answer choices

  1. Unclear Impact6% picked this

    Heating raw milk in a microwave oven to a temperature of 100 degrees Celsius destroys nearly all of the lysozyme

    The destruction of the enzyme could be explained by either the temperature or the microwaves. If anything, this just seems to reinforce that heating via microwave is bad for the enzyme, which would strengthen the author's conclusion.

  2. Out of Scope7% picked this

    Enzymes in raw milk that are destroyed through excessive heating can be replaced by adding enzymes that have

    Whether destroyed enzymes can be replaced is not relevant to the argument. We're here to figure out the causal mystery of why 50º microwaved milk has so much less lysozyme than does 50º conventionally heated milk. This answer joins the story after the murder of the lysozyme's has already been committed and asks, "Who will take Lyso's place, now that it's gone?" We're trying to figure out what killed Lyso in the first place.

  3. Irrelevant Comparison24% picked this

    A liquid exposed to a conventional heat source of exactly 50 degrees Celsius will reach that temperature more slowly than it would if it

    The rate at which a liquid reaches 50 degrees Celsius is not relevant to this argument. This is just telling you that the liquid on your stovetop will heat up more quickly if you turn up the burner (i.e. hotter conventional heat sources accelerate the warming process).

  4. Irrelevant Comparison3% picked this

    Milk that has been heated in a microwave oven does not taste noticeably different from milk that has been briefly heated by

    The taste of milk is not relevant to this argument. We're only concerned with the mystery of the missing lysozyme.

  5. Correct60% picked this

    Heating any liquid by microwave creates small zones within it that are much hotter than the overall temperature that

    Why this is right

    This weakens the argument by supporting the possibility that heat is what explains the discrepancy in the concentration of the enzyme. It could be the zones that are much hotter that destroy the enzyme. It gives us an Alternate Explanation for why more lysozyme is destroyed via microwaving: it's not that microwaves themselves are to blame. It's just that temperatures higher than 50º are to blame. The microwave is creating certain zone that might be 80º while others are only 20º. The liquid will average out to be 50º, but those 80º areas were so hot that they destroyed the lysozyme in them. Meanwhile, we assume, conventional ovens don't work this way, and so they manage to heat something to 50º without causing specific zones in there to be much hotter than 50º. This answer helps us argue the Anti-Conclusion, that what destroys the lysozyme IS the heat.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free