A cup of raw milk, after being heated in a microwave oven to 50 degrees Celsius, contains half its initial concentration of a particular enzyme, lysozyme.
Conclusion (therefore)
What destroys the enzyme is not heat itself but heat obtained via microwaves.
Evidence
If you heat milk via microwave to 50 degrees Celsius, it contains half its initial concentration of a particular enzyme, lysozyme.
But if you heat milk via conventional heat source to 50 degrees Celsius, it still has basically all its lysozyme.
Evaluate
This is an Anti-Causal conclusion and a Causal conclusion. It's saying .
With causal / anti-causal conclusions, we typically can use our Explain Curious Fact framework.
Curious Fact: how come the lysozyme gets cut in half when you microwave milk to 50º?
Author's Explanation: it's the microwaves themselves ruining the lysozyme, not the heat.
Goal
Given this framework, we weaken by suggesting an Alternate Explanation for the curious fact:
Or by hurting the plausibility of the Author's Explanation:
If we were just doing our standard Weaken prephrase, we'd think in terms of the Anti-Conclusion: