Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT122 S1 Q16 Explanation

With decreased production this year

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

With decreased production this year in many rice-growing countries, prices of the grain on world markets have increased. Analysts blame this increase on the fact that only a small percentage of world production is sold commercially, with government growers controlling most of the rest, distributing it for local consumption. With so little can significantly affect the amount of rice available on world markets.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

Which one of the following, if true, would most call into question the analysts’ explanation of

Answer choices

  1. No Impact5% picked this

    Rice-importing countries reduce purchases of rice when the price

    This tells us an Effect of the more-costly rice situation, but we're looking to investigate the Cause of the more-costly rice situation.

  2. Opposite / Irrelevant8% picked this

    In times of decreased rice production, governments store more of the rice they control and reduce their

    This helps the author to argue that there is a shortage of rice supply, in a sense, since governments are now hoarding their rice and not even distributing it. More to the point, though, it's kind of irrelevant to the author's hypothesis, since the rice that the government controls is a separate pile from the rice on the world market, and the author's hypothesis is about how much rice is available on the world market. This answer doesn't tell us anything that seems to impact how much rice is available on the world market. It just tells us about how the government does something different with its private rice stash.

  3. Correct68% picked this

    In times of decreased rice production, governments export some of the rice originally intended for local distribution to

    Why this is right

    This hurts the plausibility of the author's causal storyline. She was saying that there would be a shortage on the world market in times of decreased rice production, but this answer is saying, "Actually, no ... in times of decreased rice production, the governments that have a private stash actually funnel some of their price into the world market (filling in the shortage)." In order for a shortage of rice on world markets to cause a price increase, there needs to be a shortage of rice! This answer calls that assumption into question.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Compatible18% picked this

    Governments that distribute the rice crop for local consumption purchase the grain commercially in the

    The two things that drive prices up are less supply and more demand. This answer is tricky, because it kind of sounds like it's giving an alternate explanation for why the price of rice went up: more demand. When rice production is decreased, governments start buying rice from world markets, so it sounds like there is a new buyer on the scene, and thus that higher demand might raise prices. The problem with picking this is that it's not really offering an alternate explanation so much as adding onto the existing one. Since we know that the global production of rice goes partly to world market (small %) and the rest to governments that control and distribute rice (large %), it's an open question about what happens when there is less rice production than normal. Does the world market get its normal amount, and the government portion is reduced. Do the governments get their normal amount and the world market is reduced. Or is it that the world market and the government portion are both reduced in similar proportion? It seems like our author's explanation is compatible with the 2nd or 3rd scenario, and this answer seems like it could be the 3rd scenario. Meanwhile, the correct answer brings us closer to the 1st scenario, where we are thinking that the world market actually gets its normal amount.

  5. Out of Scope: other crops2% picked this

    During reduced rice harvests, rice-importing countries import other kinds of crops, although this fails to compensate

    Whether or not countries import other crops during rice shortages has very little, if anything, to do with why the price of rice went up.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free