Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT121 S3 P2 Q8 Explanation

Gluck’s Poetry

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMeaning in ContextHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The poet Louise Glück has said that she feels comfortable writing within a tradition often characterized as belonging only to male poets. About her own experience reading poetry, Glück notes that her gender did not keep her from appreciating the poems of Shakespeare, Blake, Keats, and other male poets. Rather she believed tradition as historically exclusionary and rhetorically inadequate for women, Glück embraces it with respect and admiration.

Glück’s formative encounters with poetry also provided her with the theoretical underpinnings of her respect for this tradition; she notes that in her youth she could sense many of the great themes and subjects of poetry even before experiencing them in her own life. These subjects—loss, the passage of time, desire—are timeless, mortality, for example, then issues of gender distinction fade behind the presence of this universal reality.

Some of Glück’s critics claim that this idea of the universal is suspect and that the idea that gender issues are transcended by addressing certain subjects may attribute to poetry an innocence that it does not have. They maintain that a female poet writing within a historically male-dominated tradition will on some strive to create a uniquely female poetry by using new forms to develop a new voice.

Glück, however, observes that this ambition, with its insistence on an essentially female perspective, is as limiting as her critics believe the historically male-dominated tradition to be. She holds that to the extent that there are some gender differences that have been shaped by history, they will emerge in the differing ways what it includes and in what it omits, inevitably speaks of its social and historical context.

What this question is testing

Meaning in Context

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
8.

As it is used in the passage, “inheritance” (first paragraph) refers most

Answer choices

  1. Opposite: burden4% picked this

    the burden that a historically male-dominated poetic canon places on a

    She's not saying she inherited some original sin, the way modern Americans might be burdened by our history of enslaving Africans or displacing/killing native Americans. "Her poetic inheritance" is meant as a positive. She enjoyed these male poets when she read them. She is proud to count herself among them.

  2. Out of Scope: acceptable8% picked this

    the set of poetic forms and techniques considered acceptable within a

    This answer makes it sound like Shakespeare, Blake, Keats, and others laid down a set of rules. "Only these poetic forms and techniques may be considered acceptable". There's no context suggesting that Gluck is talking about what forms or techniques are allowed. The passage overall suggests that Gluck feels very unconstrained in terms of what she should write about or how she should write. We're looking for something more like, "the set of poets and poetic works considered great within a linguistic culture".

  3. Correct52% picked this

    the poetry written in a particular language, whose achievement serves as a model for other poets

    Why this is right

    Like most correct answers to Meaning in Context, this is reinforcing what was talked about in the surrounding sentences. Gluck believed that "Shakespeare, Blake, Keats, and other male poets" where her poetic inheritance. They were the models of great poetry she had growing up. She appreciated them and considers herself pursuing a similar type of greatness. Gluck embraces this tradition, this poetic inheritance "with respect and admiration". A Persian poet might consider Rumi to be part of their poetic inheritance. A South American poet might consider Pablo Neruda to be part of their poetic inheritance. People writing in the English language might consider Shakespeare / Walt Whitman / Robert Frost to be part of their poetic inheritance.

    Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Too Strong: only / most1% picked this

    the presumption that contemporary poets can write only on subjects already explored by the poets in that language who are considered

    Just like (A), this sounds like a negative, whereas the phrase "poetic inheritance" was being used in a positive way. Just like (B), this sounds like poetic inheritance involves strict rules, whereas the passage was just referring to it as "the cultural tradition surrounding a certain practice". (Jimmy Fallon and Stephen Colbert would consider their late-night host inheritance to be Johnny Carson, David Letterman, Conan O'Brien, etc.) Gluck isn't saying that she feels like contemporary poets can only write about subjects covered by Shakespeare, Blake, and Keats.

  5. Too Strong: imposition of style34% picked this

    the imposition on a poet, based on the poetry of preceding generations in that language, of

    This also sounds somewhat negative and restrictive. Was Gluck saying that she feels like Shakespeare, Blake, and Keats have imposed a particular writing style on her? No. She feels free to write whatever she wants to write. She was only saying in the 1st paragraph that "being a female poet never stopped me from appreciating the great male poets that make up the bulk of my poetic inheritance".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free