Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT121 S1 Q17 Explanation

Some classes of animal are

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsFlaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Some classes of animal are so successful that they spread into virtually every ecosystem, whereas others gradually recede until they inhabit only small niches in geographically isolated areas and thereby become threatened. Insects are definitely of the former sort and ants are the most successful of these, Fuego. Hence, no species of ant is a threatened species.

What this question is testing

Flaw

Your task

Describe the reasoning error the argument actually commits.

Common trap

Answers that name a real logical flaw the argument doesn't actually make.

Winning move

Articulate the gap in the reasoning yourself, then match it to the choice that describes that gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

The argument is flawed because it takes for

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: geographically isolated5% picked this

    the Arctic Circle and Tierra del Fuego do not constitute geographically

    The author merely brings up these two examples as rhetorical way of saying "from Pole to Pole", from the far North to the far South of the globe. It doesn't matter whether they're geographically isolated or connected.

  2. Too Strong: most2% picked this

    because ants do not inhabit only a small niche in a geographically isolated area, they are

    We can't say whether the author would say ants are or aren't like 51% or more of insects. Given that insects are identified as a very successful class, it's plausible that most of them inhabit a wide swatch of geographical areas, just like ants.

  3. Too Strong: only9% picked this

    the only way a class of animal can avoid being threatened is to spread into

    The author doesn't need to assume that there's one and only one way to avoid being threatened.

  4. Reversed16% picked this

    what is true of the constituent elements of a whole is also true

    This argument said, because it's true of the whole (ants, as a type of insect), it's true of the constituent elements (each ant). This says the reverse.

  5. Correct68% picked this

    what is true of a whole is also true of its

    Why this is right

    What's true of the whole family of ants is that they are super successful. In concluding that every single ant species is unthreatened, the author is assuming that each any species must be super successful.

    Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free