Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT119 S2 Q9 Explanation

Alice: In democracies, politicians garner

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsAgree/Disagree

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Alice: In democracies, politicians garner support by emphasizing the differences between their opponents and themselves. Because they must rule in accord with their rhetoric, policies one party succeeds another.

Elwell: But despite election rhetoric, to put together majority coalitions in democracies, politicians usually end up softening their stands they are elected.

What this question is testing

Agree/Disagree

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
9.

The statements above provide the most support for the claim that Alice and Elwell

Answer choices

  1. Nobody Disagrees10% picked this

    politicians heighten the differences between themselves and their opponents

    This is Alice's first claim, which we think Elwell agrees with.

  2. Correct85% picked this

    basic policies change drastically when one party succeeds another in

    Why this is right

    This is Alice's 3rd claim. She thinks that policies DO change drastically when one party succeeds another. Elwell never says that they don't, but he is arguing that they don't. He's saying, that politicians usually end up softening their stands (which means they compromise more with their opponents), so they don't end up enacting policies that are wildly different than those enacted by the opposing party once they get back into power.

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Nobody Agrees / Too Strong: the best3% picked this

    in a democracy the best way of ensuring continuity in policies is to form

    Neither person comments on the best way to ensure continuity in policies.

  4. Nobody Agrees / Too Strong: most1% picked this

    most voters stay loyal to a particular political party even as it changes its stand

    Neither person comments on whether most voters do anything. They talk about what politicians usually do, but not about voters.

  5. Trap2% picked this

    the desire of parties to build majority coalitions tends to support

    Nobody Disagrees Unsupported Causality: tends to support Neither person talks about whether the desire to build a coalition supports democratic systems, undermines them, or is neutral when it comes to democratic systems. If anything, we might argue that Elwell agrees with this, but we certainly couldn't say Alice disagrees with it. She said nothing about coalitions at all, so we have no idea how she feels about them.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free