Reading Comprehension

PT119 · S1 · P3 · Q21 Pronghorns

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The pronghorn, an antelope-like mammal that lives on the western plains of North America, is the continent’s fastest land animal, capable of running 90 kilometers per hour and of doing so for several kilometers.

Topic

Why pronghorns run faster than any modern North American predator — the "relict behavior" hypothesis.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy / Problem-Solution. The author presents the puzzle, the relict-behavior hypothesis, the supporting evidence (including pronghorn herding), and similar relict behaviors in other animals.

Main Point

The pronghorn's extraordinary speed and other behaviors are best explained as adaptations to long-extinct predators — relict behaviors. The supporting evidence (pronghorn herding, mate selection, plus parallel cases in fish and ground squirrels) increases the plausibility of relict-behavior explanations.

P1: The puzzle and the proposed solution

Pronghorns can run 90 km/h, far faster than any modern North American predator. One biologist proposes that pronghorns adapted to predators known from the fossil record (American cheetahs, long-legged hyenas) that have been extinct for 10,000 years.

P2: Why biologists are wary of relict behaviors

Most biologists distrust relict-behavior explanations because they're hard to test (the principal component is extinct). They're typically considered only when alternatives fail. But present-day observations sometimes yield supporting evidence.

P3: Evidence for the pronghorn case

Several pronghorn behaviors look like adaptations to extinct enemies. Pronghorns herd, which gives more eyes to watch for predators and reduces the chance any one animal is attacked — but causes overcrowding and food competition. Since pronghorns have nothing to fear from present-day carnivores, herding looks like a relict adaptation. Similarly, female pronghorns choose mates by speed and endurance, which would have been useful when fast predators existed.

21.

The third paragraph of the passage provides the most support for which one of the following inferences?

  1. Predators do not attack grazing

    Too Strong (do not attack)

    We're told that assembling into herds diminishes the chances of any particular animal being attacked, but this answer is saying that herding eliminates the chance that one of the animals will be attacked.

    7% picked this

  2. Pronghorns tend to graze in

    Too Strong: only Contradicted

    This is not only way too strong (only), but it's also contradicted. The 3rd paragraph was telling us that pronghorns continue to graze, even though the predator threat that gave rise to this herding behavior no longer exists in the pronghorn's environment. So the pronghorns are constantly grazing even though "they have nothing to fear from present-day carnivores and thus have nothing to gain from herding".

    5% picked this

  3. If animals do not graze

    Too Strong (conditional)

    This is saying that "all animals that roam in herds graze for food". We can't possibly support any categorical that strong from what we were told about the pronghorn in the 3rd paragraph.

    4% picked this

  4. Female pronghorns mate only with

    Too Strong: only

    The end of the 3rd paragraph is saying that female pronghorns choose mates based on traits such as speed and endurance. It also says that a female will choose the victor after two males challenge each other in a race. But this answer is saying that every single female pronghorn in a herd mates with the same male. Whoever is fastest in the herd mates with all the females. We weren't told that. The idea is that females will pick faster mates over slower mates, but it wasn't saying that all females mate with the same male.

    18% picked this

  5. Correct

    If pronghorns did not herd,

    Why this is right

    The 3rd paragraph is telling us that herding is an example of a behavior that was created in response to a predator that no longer exists. Back in the day, the pronghorn was preyed on by big carnivores and so it adapted herding as a defense mechanism. But those carnivores are now extinct, yet the pronghorns continue to herd as a relict behavior. As the 3rd paragraph tells us, "Pronghorns have nothing to fear from present-day carnivores and thus have nothing to gain from herding". So were they to stop herding, they wouldn't face significantly greater danger.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    66% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free