Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT118 S2 P2 Q14 Explanation

Hippocratic Oath

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsPrimary PurposeHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The moral precepts embodied in the Hippocratic oath, which physicians standardly affirm upon beginning medical practice, have long been considered the immutable bedrock of medical ethics, binding physicians in a moral community that reaches across temporal, cultural, and national barriers. Until very recently the promises expressed in that oath—for example to act physicians in ancient Greece and that for centuries it was not uniformly accepted by medical practitioners.

This historical issue may be dismissed at the outset as irrelevant to the oath’s current appropriateness. Regardless of the specific origin of its text—which, admittedly, is at best uncertain—those in each generation who critically appraise its content and judge it to express valid principles of medical ethics become, in a more meaningful within the confines of one’s expertise, which remains a necessary safeguard for patients’ safety and well-being.

What this question is testing

Primary Purpose

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Which one of the following would be most suitable as a title for this passage if it were to appear

Answer choices

  1. Wrong Emphasis: lacks central topic15% picked this

    “The Ancients versus the Moderns: Conflicting Ideas About

    This title doesn't even reveal that we're going to read an article about the Hippocratic Oath, so that feels way off. This also seems to be an article that just summarizes two different points of view, neither of which are the author's. Meanwhile, this passage has a very specific editorial point of view from our author.

  2. Too Negative6% picked this

    “Hypocritical Oafs: Why ‘Managed Care’ Proponents are Seeking to Repeal an

    Too Negative: oafs Wrong Emphasis: managed care It's not clear whether this article would contain an opinion from the author, unless it's meant to convey that the proponents seeking to repeal the Hippocratic Oath are hypocritical oafs, which is way too strong and negative. The author thought that the concern over who really originally authored the Oath was dumb, but she otherwise respected the concerns that reformers had with outdated parts of the Oath. The reference in the title to "managed care" is a huge red flag. "Managed Care" came up in one part of one sentence of the passage. There's no way that concept would be in the headline or title.

  3. Wrong Emphasis: historical origins7% picked this

    “Genetic Fallacy in the Age of Gene-Splicing: Why the Origins of the Hippocratic

    The author agrees that the origins of the Oath don't matter (the beginning of the 2nd paragraph says as much), but that's not the primary reason the author wrote the passage. After dismissing the origins issue as irrelevant, she says, "More importantly", before turning into her real priority. She wrote this passage to implore us to keep the core value of beneficence and only tinker with this Oath by changing peripheral stuff.

  4. Wrong Point of View6% picked this

    “The Dead Hand of Hippocrates: Breaking the Hold of Ancient Ideas

    The critics who would like to get rid of the Oath would write an article saying "let's break the grip of these outdated ideas on modern medicine". But our author wrote the passage to say "the core value of beneficence should be retained with adaptation at the oath's periphery".

  5. Correct65% picked this

    “Prescription for the Hippocratic Oath: Facelift or

    Why this is right

    This captures the main topic, the Hippocratic Oath. It captures the Challenge Position framework of the passage. There is this recent wave of criticism calling for a major overhaul (if not disposal) of the Oath. They want major surgery. The author's thesis is saying, "No, guys. We still need this oath, or something pretty similar. Keep the core value the same, and just tinker with the edges if you want to modernize some of the outdated stuff". She is advocating a mere facelift. This title poses a question, and our author's main point would answer the question by the end ("I think the Oath just needs a facelift, not major surgery")

    Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free