Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT118 S2 P2 Q13 Explanation

Hippocratic Oath

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor's AttitudeHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The moral precepts embodied in the Hippocratic oath, which physicians standardly affirm upon beginning medical practice, have long been considered the immutable bedrock of medical ethics, binding physicians in a moral community that reaches across temporal, cultural, and national barriers. Until very recently the promises expressed in that oath—for example to act physicians in ancient Greece and that for centuries it was not uniformly accepted by medical practitioners.

This historical issue may be dismissed at the outset as irrelevant to the oath’s current appropriateness. Regardless of the specific origin of its text—which, admittedly, is at best uncertain—those in each generation who critically appraise its content and judge it to express valid principles of medical ethics become, in a more meaningful within the confines of one’s expertise, which remains a necessary safeguard for patients’ safety and well-being.

What this question is testing

Author's Attitude

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

Which one of the following can most accurately be used to describe the author’s attitude toward critics of

Answer choices

  1. Opposite3% picked this

    enthusiastic

    This is a Challenge Position passage, not an "I enthusiastically support these critics of the oath" passage.

  2. Too Strong: dismissal Unsupported: bemused3% picked this

    bemused

    Dismissal is sometimes in correct answers, if the author very clearly disagrees with someone's position, but it's a pretty harsh form of disagreement. It's also a trappy answer, because it's playing off the language in the beginning of the 2nd paragraph about "dismissing that issue at the outset". The author does not dismiss the more substantive critique. She engages with it. Bemused is like a combo of "befuddled / confused". The author doesn't seem confused in her dismissal.

  3. Correct75% picked this

    reasoned

    Why this is right

    This is a more moderate form of Challenge a Position. She didn't reject/dismiss the Position outright. She provided reasons for her disagreement. She made some concessions but argued, "Hey --- stay off my core value of beneficence."

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Too Strong / Opposite: strict neutrality2% picked this

    strict

    If we thought we were doing a Challenge Position passage, then it wouldn't make any sense to say the author was strictly neutral towards that Position. Our author is definitely not neutral in the beginning of the 2nd paragraph, when she's dismissing one of the critics' arguments by saying it's irrelevant to whether the oath is appropriate.

  5. Wrong Emphasis17% picked this

    guarded

    Because there are some concessions here and there, we could water down the author's Disagreement and say something like "predominantly disagreement". But we shouldn't be emphasizing the noun agreement. Again, this was a Challenge Position passage. We should be emphasizing challenge / resist / disagree.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free