Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT118 S1 Q17 Explanation

In practice the government will

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMain Conclusion

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

In practice the government will have the last word on what an individual’s rights are, because its police will do what its officials and courts say. But that does not mean that the government’s view is necessarily the correct view; anyone who thinks it is must believe that persons have only which means that they have no moral rights at all.

What this question is testing

Main Conclusion

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of

Answer choices

  1. Premise7% picked this

    Individuals have no rights at all unless the government says that

    This answer repeats the premise, which is also the last claim (which is a common trap answer on Main Conclusion).

  2. Correct85% picked this

    What government officials and courts say an individual’s rights are may

    Why this is right

    This matches the main conclusion of the argument indicating skepticism about the correctness of the government’s view of rights.

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Opposing Idea4% picked this

    Individuals have rights unless the government says that they

    This answer suggests a premise opposing the argument's stance. It implies something about individual rights that contradicts the argument's main point.

  4. Background1% picked this

    The police always agree with government officials and the courts about what an

    This option suggests cooperation between police and government, which serves as context for the author's conclusion, but it’s not the conclusion itself.

  5. Assumption-Bait3% picked this

    One should always try to uphold one’s individual rights against the government’s view of what

    This very strong statement may feel like an assumption inherent in upholding individual rights but was not explicitly stated in the argument. Thus, it shouldn't be tempting as a match for the explicit conclusion.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free