Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT117 S2 Q15 Explanation

According to current geological theory,

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

According to current geological theory, the melting of ice at the end of the Ice Age significantly reduced the weight pressing on parts of the earth’s crust. As a result, lasting cracks in the earth’s crust appeared in some of those parts under the stress of pressure from below. At the end is likely that the melting of the ice contributed to these earthquakes.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
15.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the

Answer choices

  1. No Impact17% picked this

    The earth’s crust tends to crack whenever there is a sudden change in the

    We already know that a reduction in pressure from melted ice leads to cracks. This answer is saying that other changes in pressure could also lead to cracks, but why would we care? That wouldn't have anything to do with the author's storyline, so it wouldn't be strengthening her storyline. We need to know whether cracks, caused by the change in pressure from melting ice, lead to earthquakes.

  2. Too Weak4% picked this

    There are various areas in Northern Europe that show cracks in

    The author is assuming that there was some melting ice close enough to Sweden that it led to a change in pressure, and thus to cracks, and thus to severe earthquakes. Her causal story assumes there are some cracks near Sweden (close enough to cause earthquakes there). But this answer is saying there are cracks somewhere in Northern Europe, from some time period (might be end of Ice Age, might not). So this is too wishy-washy to tell us anything.

  3. No Impact9% picked this

    Evidence of severe earthquakes around the time of the end of the Ice Age can be found in

    This doesn't seem to have any impact on making the "melting ice" hypothesis more or less plausible. If we knew that there were severe earthquakes and melting ice near the end of the Ice Age in northern Canada, then that would strengthen the notion that melting ice is connected to these earthquakes. But this answer just tells us that there were also earthquakes elsewhere.

  4. Correct69% picked this

    Severe earthquakes are generally caused by cracking of the earth’s crust near

    Why this is right

    This helps us with our missing link in the causal chain. The author is trying to prove a causal connection between melting ice and severe earthquakes. melting ----------------------> severe ice quakes She established this so far melting ----> less ---> cracks ice pressure So she needs to establish that "cracks lead to quakes", and that's what this answer provides.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Weakens, if anything1% picked this

    Asteroid impacts, which did occur at the end of the Ice Age, generally

    This seems to point out a potential Alternate Explanation for the earthquakes, which would weaken. (As discussed earlier, technically an Alternate Explanation doesn't really weaken this argument, because the conclusion isn't saying that the earthquakes were only caused by melting ice, but still, this feels more like weaken than like strengthen).

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free