Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT117 S2 Q14 Explanation

The economy is doing badly.

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The economy is doing badly. First, the real estate slump has been with us for some time. Second, car sales are at their lowest in years. Of course, had either one or the other phenomenon failed to occur, this would be consistent with the economy as makes it quite probable that my conclusion is correct.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Which one of the following inferences is most strongly supported by the

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: likely1% picked this

    If car sales are at their lowest in years, then it is likely that the

    This is way too strong of a statement. We think that if car sales and real estate are doing badly then it's likely the economy is doing badly. But if just one of them is doing badly, we have no ammunition for saying it's likely that the economy is doing badly. The author went out of her way to say that if only one of them is doing badly, the economy overall could still be healthy.

  2. Reversed Logic3% picked this

    If the economy is doing badly, then either the real estate market or the car sales

    Our last sentence can function like a "soft" conditional (because its outcome isn't certain, but merely probable). real estate bad and ? economy probably bad car sales bad As soon as we see this answer is putting "bad economy" into the trigger position (whereas the information we were given put it into the outcome position), we can tell that this is attempting some illegal reversal.

  3. Too Strong: likely17% picked this

    If the real estate market is healthy, then it is likely that the economy as

    First of all, the passage gave us no mechanism at all for supporting / proving that the economy is healthy. If we wanted to pretend the 4th sentence were a conditional, we could say this: real estate healthy or ? possible econ is healthy car sales healthy The idea of "X is consistent with Y" just means that they don't contradict. It is possible for X and Y to both occur. So while we can support the notion that a healthy real estate market can coincide with a healthy economy, we can't support the idea that a healthy real estate market by itself makes a healthy economy probable.

  4. Correct68% picked this

    If the economy is in a healthy state, then it is unlikely that the real estate and car sales markets

    Why this is right

    Our last sentence can function like a "soft" conditional (because its outcome isn't certain, but merely probable). real estate bad and ? economy probably bad car sales bad The contrapositive of that would look like this answer choice: economy probably real estate good healthy ? or car sales good (i.e. not bad) Consider this analogy: Danielle knows that when both of her parents are mad at the same time, it is quite probable that they are having a fight with each other. Thus, if one of her parents is in a good mood, then it is unlikely that they are having a fight with each other. Since X and Y occurring together make Z probable, if Z isn't occurring, then it's improbable that X and Y are both occurring.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Reversed Logic12% picked this

    The bad condition of the economy implies that both the real estate and the car sales

    Our last sentence can function like a "soft" conditional: real estate bad and ? economy probably bad car sales bad The word "implies" is the same as the conditional arrow. "X implies Y" = X ? Y So this answer is just reading the conditional idea backwards. economy bad ? bad real estate & bad car sales

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free