Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT117 S1 P4 Q27 Explanation

The Modern Movement

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsPrimary PurposeHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The proponents of the Modern Movement in architecture considered that, compared with the historical styles that it replaced, Modernist architecture more accurately reflected the functional spirit of twentieth-century technology and was better suited to the newest building methods. It is ironic, then, that the Movement fostered at odds with the way buildings were really built.

The tenacious adherence of Modernist architects and critics to this ideology was in part responsible for the Movement’s decline. Originating in the 1920s as a marginal, almost bohemian art movement, the Modern Movement was never very popular with the public, but this very lack of popular support produced in Modernist architects a drawn to only those features of their work that were “Modern”; other aspects were conveniently ignored.

The decline of the Modern Movement later in the twentieth century occurred partly as a result of Modernist architects’ ignorance of building methods, and partly because Modernist architects were reluctant to admit that their concerns were chiefly aesthetic. Moreover, the building industry was evolving in a direction Modernists had not anticipated: it could only be accomplished at considerable cost—hence the well-founded reputation of Modern architecture as prohibitively expensive.

As Postmodern architects recognized, the need to expose structural elements imposed unnecessary limitations on building design. The unwillingness of architects of the Modern Movement to abandon their ideals interest in the Modern Movement.

What this question is testing

Primary Purpose

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
27.

The author of the passage is primarily

Answer choices

  1. Correct90% picked this

    analyzing the failure of a

    Why this is right

    This aligns with our Most Valuable Sentences. (end of 1st): The Movement fostered an ideology that proved at odds with the way buildings were built (beginning of 2nd) The tenacious adherence of Modernist architects was in part responsible for the Movement's decline. (beginning of 3rd) The decline of the Modern Movement later in the 20th century occurred partly as a result of Modernist architects' ignorance of building methods.

    Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Out of Scope: future1% picked this

    predicting the future course of a

    Nothing in the passage discusses the future of Modernism.

  3. Out of Scope: misunderstanding4% picked this

    correcting a misunderstanding about a

    The passage isn't framed around a misconception that we're trying to correct. It's not like some people think Modernism died because of X, but the author is explaining to them it really died because of Y and Z.

  4. Out of Scope: anticipating possible1% picked this

    anticipating possible criticism of a

    This answer seems to have the tense all wrong. The Modern Movement already happened. It already received its criticisms. It already declined by the end of the 1900's. So the author isn't writing this passage to predict what people might say critically about the movement in the future.

  5. Out of Scope: incompatible views4% picked this

    contrasting incompatible viewpoints about a

    The word "incompatible" basically means contradictory. Were there contradictory views about Modernism in this passage that the author was trying to contrast? No, none of the views contradict. For example, the Modernists like to "honestly expose structural materials such as steel and concrete". A criticism of Modernism is that "doing so with a visually acceptable result requires a high level of craftmanship". Those do not contradict each other. A contradiction would be "honestly exposing structural materials doesn't require a high level of craftmanship".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free